These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6724175)

  • 21. Self-perceived and audiometric evaluations of hearing aid benefit in the elderly.
    Taylor KS
    Ear Hear; 1993 Dec; 14(6):390-4. PubMed ID: 8307242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Functional gain of already implanted hearing devices in patients with sensorineural hearing loss of varied origin and extent: Berlin experience.
    Junker R; Gross M; Todt I; Ernst A
    Otol Neurotol; 2002 Jul; 23(4):452-6. PubMed ID: 12170144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of hearing-aid gain using functional, coupler, and probe-tube measurements.
    Mason D; Popelka GR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 3724114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of frequency response characteristics on speech discrimination and perceived intelligibility and pleasantness of speech for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Byrne D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):494-504. PubMed ID: 3745682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Age-related hearing difficulties. I. Hearing impairment, disability, and handicap--a controlled study.
    Salomon G; Vesterager V; Jagd M
    Audiology; 1988; 27(3):164-78. PubMed ID: 3408401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Vibrant soundbridge versus conventional hearing aid in sensorineural high-frequency hearing loss: a prospective study.
    Truy E; Philibert B; Vesson JF; Labassi S; Collet L
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):684-7. PubMed ID: 18434928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The influence of central auditory processing on the intelligibility of the speech in the patients presenting with hearing impairment].
    Boboshko MY; Berdnikova IP; Garbaruk ES; Salakhbekov MA; Mal'tseva NV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2018; 83(2):4-8. PubMed ID: 29697645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digital hearing aids for high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss: preliminary experience with the RetroX device.
    Barbara M; Bandiera G; Serra B; Marrone V; Tarentini S; Pinna JC; Ronchetti F; Graziadio M; Monini S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):693-6. PubMed ID: 16012028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Hearing Handicap Scale as a measure of hearing aid benefit.
    Tannahill JC
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1979 Feb; 44(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 423559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reliability and stability of various hearing-aid outcome measures in a group of elderly hearing-aid wearers.
    Humes LE; Halling D; Coughlin M
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Oct; 39(5):923-35. PubMed ID: 8898247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors underlying the speech-recognition performance of elderly hearing-aid wearers.
    Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1112-32. PubMed ID: 12243159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
    Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Users' satisfaction with hearing aids.
    Cunningham DR; Merle KS; Drake J
    J Am Aud Soc; 1978; 4(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 299591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Frequency selectivity and speech intelligibility in noise.
    Lyregaard PE
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():113-22. PubMed ID: 6955919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Amplification with digital noise reduction and the perception of annoying and aversive sounds.
    Palmer CV; Bentler R; Mueller HG
    Trends Amplif; 2006 Jun; 10(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 16959733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An evaluation of three adaptive hearing aid selection strategies.
    Neuman AC; Levitt H; Mills R; Schwander T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Dec; 82(6):1967-76. PubMed ID: 3429734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Benefit from, and acclimatization to, frequency compression hearing aids in experienced adult hearing-aid users.
    Ellis RJ; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jan; 54(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 25470620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
    Reber MB; Kompis M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.