These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6724775)

  • 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Learning to live with uncertainty.
    Lentnek AL
    Int J Dermatol; 1984 Apr; 23(3):187-9. PubMed ID: 6724775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spiral gradient endpoint: a new method of susceptibility testing.
    Hill GB
    Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1990 Oct; 25 Suppl 4():31-7. PubMed ID: 2120271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpretation of the agar diffusion method for bacterial susceptibility testing.
    Arvidson S; Dornbusch K; Ericsson H
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1981 Jan; 7(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 7204292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Historical survey of tests to determine bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobial agents.
    Laverdiere M; Sabath LD
    Mt Sinai J Med; 1977; 44(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 321948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standardizing antimicrobial disk sensitivity testing.
    Faler K
    Mod Vet Pract; 1984 Mar; 65(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 6727855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Final report from the Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, on the agar dilution method (2007).
    Nagayama A; Yamaguchi K; Watanabe K; Tanaka M; Kobayashi I; Nagasawa Z
    J Infect Chemother; 2008 Oct; 14(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 18936894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Harmonization of antimicrobial susceptibility testing breakpoints in Europe: implications for reporting intermediate susceptibility.
    Brown D; Macgowan A
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2010 Feb; 65(2):183-5. PubMed ID: 19996143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Coefficient of microorganism antibiotic sensitivity determined by diffusion in agar using disks].
    Polovoĭ AM
    Antibiot Med Biotekhnol; 1985 Nov; 30(11):843-5. PubMed ID: 4091518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Towards better antimicrobial susceptibility testing: impact of the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
    Wootton M; MacGowan AP; Howe RA
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2017 Feb; 72(2):323-329. PubMed ID: 28115501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Methods for the rapid determination of microbial sensitivity to antibiotics].
    D'iakov SI; Il'na NIu; Lebedeva IK
    Antibiotiki; 1983 Jul; 28(7):545-54. PubMed ID: 6354076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determination of the ID50 values of antibacterial agents in agar.
    Kato T; Kurashige S; Chabbert YA; Mitsuhashi S
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1978 Dec; 31(12):1299-303. PubMed ID: 368001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality controls for antimicrobial disk diffusion testing on Leptospira Vanaporn Wuthiekanun agar.
    Wuthiekanun V; White NJ; Amornchai P; Day NP; Limmathurotsakul D
    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2016 Nov; 110(11):673-675. PubMed ID: 28173599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fosfomycin: interpretation of inhibition zones obtained with the Bauer-Kirby agar disk diffusion susceptibility test.
    Traub WH; Spohr M
    Chemotherapy; 1983; 29(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 6872618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EUCAST Definitive Document E.DEF 2.1, August 2000: Determination of antimicrobial susceptibility test breakpoints.
    European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID)
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2000 Oct; 6(10):570-2. PubMed ID: 11168058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Quality control for antibiotic sensitivity testing in 2013].
    Veldman K; Heuvelink A; De Leure PT; Mevius D
    Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 2014 Feb; 139(2):36-7, 39. PubMed ID: 24909035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Standardization of the methods of determining microorganism sensitivity to antibiotics. The effect of the size of the inoculate on the results of determining microorganism sensitivity to antibiotics and its standardization].
    Givental' NI; Ved'mina EA
    Antibiotiki; 1978 Jun; 23(6):513-20. PubMed ID: 677838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A report from the committee on microbroth dilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing : issues in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae: a comparison of the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy lysed horse blood and the CLSI HTM broth microdilution methods.
    Yamaguchi K; Hirakata Y; Kobayashi I; Ikedo M; Ohno A
    J Infect Chemother; 2012 Feb; 18(1):134-43. PubMed ID: 21894455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EUCAST Definitive Document E.Def 1.2, May 2000: Terminology relating to methods for the determination of susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial agents.
    European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Dieases (ESCMID)
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2000 Sep; 6(9):503-8. PubMed ID: 11168186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Multi-center evaluation of Showa disk susceptibility to presumptively determine minimum inhibitory concentrations through linear regression analysis].
    Sato Y; Nagata K; Tasaki Y; Tosaka M; Yamane N
    Rinsho Byori; 1991 Apr; 39(4):429-36. PubMed ID: 2051626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The quality of antimicrobial susceptibility testing disks.
    Brown DF; Warner M; Bradley J; Taylor CE
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1982 Nov; 10(5):373-82. PubMed ID: 7174564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.