89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6725771)
1. Speech recognition in a special case of low-frequency hearing loss.
Van Tasell DJ; Turner CW
J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Apr; 75(4):1207-12. PubMed ID: 6725771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.
Baer T; Moore BC; Kluk K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1133-44. PubMed ID: 12243160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24. PubMed ID: 8550937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of multichannel compression/expansion amplification on the intelligibility of nonsense syllables in noise.
Walker G; Byrne D; Dillon H
J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Sep; 76(3):746-57. PubMed ID: 6491047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recognition of low-pass-filtered consonants in noise with normal and impaired high-frequency hearing.
Horwitz AR; Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):409-16. PubMed ID: 11831814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
Rankovic CM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1043-57. PubMed ID: 9479758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Amos NE; Humes LE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech recognition in noise as a function of highpass-filter cutoff frequency for people with and without low-frequency cochlear dead regions.
Vinay ; Baer T; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):606-9. PubMed ID: 18273950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.
Vickers DA; Moore BC; Baer T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1164-75. PubMed ID: 11519583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low-frequency hearing loss: perception of filtered speech, psychophysical tuning curves, and masking.
Thornton AR; Abbas PJ; Abbas PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Feb; 67(2):638-43. PubMed ID: 7358904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhanced discrimination of low-frequency sounds for subjects with high-frequency dead regions.
Moore BC; Vinay SN
Brain; 2009 Feb; 132(Pt 2):524-36. PubMed ID: 19036764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Masked and filtered simulation of hearing loss: effects on consonant recognition.
Fabry DA; Van Tasell DJ
J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):170-8. PubMed ID: 3724111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech competition effects on synthetic stop-vowel perception by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
Gordon-Salant SM; Wightman FL
J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 May; 73(5):1756-65. PubMed ID: 6223058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frequency selectivity and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners with equivalent masked thresholds.
Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1165-74. PubMed ID: 7876438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Importance of Extended High-Frequency Speech Information in the Recognition of Digits, Words, and Sentences in Quiet and Noise.
Polspoel S; Kramer SE; van Dijk B; Smits C
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):913-920. PubMed ID: 34772838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers.
Humes LE; Dirks DD; Bell TS; Kincaid GE
J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Mar; 81(3):765-73. PubMed ID: 3584685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acoustic stapedius reflex function in man revisited.
Aiken SJ; Andrus JN; Bance M; Phillips DP
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):e38-51. PubMed ID: 23403808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
