These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6726134)

  • 1. Evaluation of bioprosthetic mitral valve failure.
    Ramsay A
    J Fam Pract; 1984 Jun; 18(6):879-82. PubMed ID: 6726134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes?
    Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
    Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ten year durability and performance of porcine bioprostheses.
    Miller DC; Oyer PE; Stinson EB; Shumway NE
    Z Kardiol; 1985; 74 Suppl 6():15-8. PubMed ID: 4096073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience.
    Goldsmith I; Lip GY; Mukundan S; Rosin MD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
    Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
    Fann JI; Miller DC; Moore KA; Mitchell RS; Oyer PE; Stinson EB; Robbins RC; Reitz BA; Shumway NE
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fatigue-induced failure of the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft in the mitral position. In vivo and in vitro correlation and a proposed classification.
    Gabbay S; Bortolotti U; Wasserman F; Factor S; Strom J; Frater RW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Jun; 87(6):836-44. PubMed ID: 6727407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term clinical results of tricuspid valve replacement.
    Chang BC; Lim SH; Yi G; Hong YS; Lee S; Yoo KJ; Kang MS; Cho BK
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Apr; 81(4):1317-23, discussion 1323-4. PubMed ID: 16564264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choice of replacement valve in the elderly.
    Kobayashi Y; Eishi K; Nagata S; Nakano K; Sasako Y; Kobayashi J; Kosakai Y; Miyatake K
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul; 6(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 9263873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized evaluation of mechanical versus biological valves in patients ages 55 to 70 years.
    Stassano P; Di Tommaso L; Monaco M; Iorio F; Pepino P; Spampinato N; Vosa C
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 54(20):1862-8. PubMed ID: 19892237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term outcomes of valve replacement with modern prostheses in young adults.
    Ruel M; Kulik A; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Bédard P; Mesana TG
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 27(3):425-33; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 15740951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of mitral valve repair and replacement with Starr, Björk, and porcine valve prostheses.
    Perier P; Deloche A; Chauvaud S; Fabiani JN; Rossant P; Bessou JP; Relland J; Bourezak H; Gomez F; Blondeau P
    Circulation; 1984 Sep; 70(3 Pt 2):I187-92. PubMed ID: 6744563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting performance and thromboembolism after porcine xenograft cardiac valve replacement.
    Geha AS; Hammond GL; Laks H; Stansel HC; Glenn WW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Mar; 83(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 7062749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic valves: a ten-year experience.
    David TE; Feindel CM; Scully HE; Bos J; Rakowski H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 9651835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Twenty-year results of the Hancock II bioprosthesis.
    Borger MA; Ivanov J; Armstrong S; Christie-Hrybinsky D; Feindel CM; David TE
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jan; 15(1):49-55; discussion 55-6. PubMed ID: 16480012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic valve: a pioneer series.
    David TE; Bos J
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Oct; 11(4 Suppl 1):9-11. PubMed ID: 10660159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pregnancy has no effect on the rate of structural deterioration of bioprosthetic valves: long-term 18-year follow up results.
    El SF; Hassan W; Latroche B; Helaly S; Hegazy H; Shahid M; Mohamed G; Al-Halees Z
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):481-5. PubMed ID: 16116874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Malfunction of a Hancock bioprosthesis in the mitral position 24 years after initial implantation.
    Niinami H; Naito Y; Koyanagi H; Nagashima H; Kasanuki H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov; 9(6):810-2. PubMed ID: 11128790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Timing of reoperation of degenerated aortic and mitral bioprostheses].
    Vogt PR; Brunner-LaRocca HP
    Z Kardiol; 2001; 90 Suppl 6():70-4. PubMed ID: 11826825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.