371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6726852)
1. The tuning fork--an essential instrument in otologic practice.
Doyle PJ; Anderson DW; Pijl S
J Otolaryngol; 1984 Apr; 13(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 6726852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The validity of tuning fork tests in diagnosing hearing loss.
Miltenburg DM
J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 7996624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical accuracy of tuning fork tests.
Stankiewicz JA; Mowry HJ
Laryngoscope; 1979 Dec; 89(12):1956-63. PubMed ID: 513917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Rinne test for conductive deafness. A critical reappraisal.
Chole RA; Cook GB
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1988 Apr; 114(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 3348896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Rinne tuning fork test.
Swan IR
Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1989 Sep; 24(9A):99-102. PubMed ID: 2506208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Tuning fork assessment of deafness.
Benjamin B
Aust Fam Physician; 1981 Jun; 10(6):461-3. PubMed ID: 7283852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [The importance of tuning forks].
Reiss M; Reiss G
Praxis (Bern 1994); 2002 Jan; 91(1-2):17-9. PubMed ID: 11824141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Tuning fork study in deafness. Thus function Rinne and Weber tests].
Ziemer C
MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Apr; 148(15):18. PubMed ID: 16711196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical utility of the 512-Hz Rinne tuning fork test.
Burkey JM; Lippy WH; Schuring AG; Rizer FM
Am J Otol; 1998 Jan; 19(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 9455950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Physical diagnostic procedures: whispered speech and tuning fork test].
Grote JJ; de Laat JA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Aug; 142(32):1816-9. PubMed ID: 9856153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hearing loss. A plan for individualized management.
Ruckenstein MJ
Postgrad Med; 1995 Oct; 98(4):197-200, 203, 206 passim. PubMed ID: 7567720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Acute perceptive hearing loss. Importance of tuning fork test in primary care].
Verburg AF; Alkhateeb WH; Merkus P
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2011; 155():A2460. PubMed ID: 21262009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Deafness].
Saint-Guily JL
Rev Infirm; 1982 Dec; 32(19):21-6. PubMed ID: 6925308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Tuning-fork tests--outdated?].
Reiss M
Fortschr Med; 1999 Apr; 117(12):18-20. PubMed ID: 10361362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rinne revisited: steel versus aluminum tuning forks.
MacKechnie CA; Greenberg JJ; Gerkin RC; McCall AA; Hirsch BE; Durrant JD; Raz Y
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):907-13. PubMed ID: 24085711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The otologist's tuning fork examination--are you striking it correctly?
Stevens JR; Pfannenstiel TJ
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Mar; 152(3):477-9. PubMed ID: 25475500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of the Weber and Rinne tuning fork tests in evaluation of children with otitis media with effusion.
Behn A; Westerberg BD; Zhang H; Riding KH; Ludemann JP; Kozak FK
J Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 17942032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tuning fork decay.
Miller GW
Laryngoscope; 1979 Mar; 89(3):459-72. PubMed ID: 431250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sudden deafness and tuning fork tests: towards optimal utilisation.
Bayoumy AB; de Ru JA
Pract Neurol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):66-68. PubMed ID: 31444233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recommended procedure for Rinne and Weber tuning fork tests.
Hinchcliffe R
Br J Audiol; 1988 May; 22(2):153. PubMed ID: 3390630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
