These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6727014)
21. What does impartiality mean in medico-legal psychiatry? An international survey. Niveau G; Godet T; Völlm B Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 66():101505. PubMed ID: 31706391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The ethical boundaries of forensic psychiatry: a view from the ivory tower. Stone AA Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 6478062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Ethical issues in forensic psychiatry: from an attorney's perspective. Weiner BA Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 6478068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. On wearing two hats: role conflict in serving as both psychotherapist and expert witness. Strasburger LH; Gutheil TG; Brodsky A Am J Psychiatry; 1997 Apr; 154(4):448-56. PubMed ID: 9090330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Psychiatric evidence on the ultimate issue. Buchanan A J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 16585229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Psychiatric expert witnesses in the new millennium. Gutheil TG Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2006 Sep; 29(3):823-32, ix. PubMed ID: 16904514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The ivory tower v. the marketplace. Modlin HC Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 6478065 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Ethics, duty of care and forensic psychiatric assessment: a legal perspective. Gaughwin PC Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1998 Oct; 32(5):722-7. PubMed ID: 9805597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. How should forensic psychiatry police itself? Guidelines and grievances: the AAPL Committee on Ethics. Weinstein HC Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):289-302. PubMed ID: 6478071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Mental health professionals and the courts: the ethics of expertise. Golding SL Int J Law Psychiatry; 1990; 13(4):281-307. PubMed ID: 2286493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Peer review of psychiatric expert testimony. American Psychiatric Association's Council on Psychiatry and Law. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 1421564 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Testifying in a mock court: the experiences of forensic advanced trainees. Ng LL; Friedman SH Australas Psychiatry; 2015 Apr; 23(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 25676214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Ethical problems in forensic-psychiatric assessment]. Barbey I Psychiatr Prax; 1988 Sep; 15(5):176-81. PubMed ID: 3054984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of plaintiff and defendant expert witness qualification in malpractice litigation in neurological surgery. Eloy JA; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Couldwell WT; Liu JK J Neurosurg; 2014 Jan; 120(1):185-90. PubMed ID: 24074492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The ethics of health care professionals' opinions for hire. Masella RS; Meister M J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Mar; 132(3):361-7. PubMed ID: 11258093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Ethical aspects of forensic psychiatry and psychology]. Gierowski JK; Jedrzejowska R; Leśniak R; Ryn ZJ Folia Med Cracov; 1998; 39(3-4):121-30. PubMed ID: 10816963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Professional versus personal ethics: methods for system reform? Miller RD Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(2):163-77. PubMed ID: 1633337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]