These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Exploring the use of the sham design for interventional trials: implications for endoscopic research. Wilcox CM Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jan; 67(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 18155434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Clinical trials; the admissibility of generalization of outcome]. Lankhorst GJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1987 Nov; 131(47):2118-20. PubMed ID: 3683648 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Expectations of the bearer of the cost of clinical studies and transformation to care by physicians under contract]. Perleth M Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2005 Jul; 130 Suppl 2():S72-6. PubMed ID: 15988672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reading between the lines of clinical trials--II: Analysis. Drug Ther Bull; 1985 Jan; 23(2):5-7. PubMed ID: 3967581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Monitoring clinical trials. Sharples K; Fleming TR; MacMahon S; Moore A; Reid I; Scoggins B N Z Med J; 1998 Aug; 111(1072):322-5. PubMed ID: 9765633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical trials in Israel. Criteria for approval. Nir I Isr J Med Sci; 1983 May; 19(5):445-8. PubMed ID: 6862851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Roaming through methodology. XII. Pragmatic and pathophysiologic trials: a question of goal formulation]. Muizelaar JP Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 May; 143(20):1063. PubMed ID: 10368734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical issues in the design of osteoporosis clinical trials: the state of the question. Heaney RP J Bone Miner Res; 2003 Jun; 18(6):1117-20. PubMed ID: 12817766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Guidelines and consensus statements regarding the conduction and reporting of clinical research studies. Falagas ME; Pitsouni EI Arch Intern Med; 2007 May; 167(9):877-8. PubMed ID: 17502527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of host factors on drug response. VII. Implications for interpretation of clinical trials and other published studies on drug response in man. Vesell ES Ration Drug Ther; 1981 Dec; 15(12):1-5. PubMed ID: 7339701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Can underpowered clinical trials be justified? Rosoff PM IRB; 2004; 26(3):16-9. PubMed ID: 15281196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparative studies of the effectiveness of therapy]. GibiĆski K Pol Tyg Lek; 1987 Jan; 42(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 3588388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. David Moher, MSc The CONSORT Guidelines: improving the quality of research. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials. Interview by Bonnie Horrigan. Moher D Altern Ther Health Med; 2002; 8(3):103-8. PubMed ID: 12017485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Grading clinical research: a midterm report card. Schechter MT; Sheps SB Can Med Assoc J; 1984 Nov; 131(9):1025-7. PubMed ID: 6498714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating research: what it means to you. Maklebust J; Margolis DJ Adv Wound Care; 1997; 10(4):4, 6. PubMed ID: 9306780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. J Postgrad Med; 2001; 47(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 11832625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]