These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6727993)

  • 1. Handling the human embryo.
    Nature; 1984 May 31-Jun 6; 309(5967):387. PubMed ID: 6727993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. British government hedges bets on embryo research.
    Hadlington S
    Nature; 1987 Dec 3-9; 330(6147):409. PubMed ID: 3683559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test-tube embryology in the dock.
    Dickson D
    Science; 1984 Aug; 225(4662):606. PubMed ID: 6740327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. UK agonizes on embryo research.
    Nature; 1985 Feb 7-13; 313(6002):424. PubMed ID: 3969148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. House of Commons votes for ban on embryo research.
    Med World News; 1985 Apr; 26(7):30. PubMed ID: 11649605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recommendations of the Warnock Committee.
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):217-8. PubMed ID: 6146766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confused comment on Warnock.
    Nature; 1984 Nov 29-Dec 5; 312(5993):389. PubMed ID: 6504148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assisted fertilization: legal restraints proposed for UK.
    Nature; 1984 Jul 26-Aug 1; 310(5975):266. PubMed ID: 6462211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Warnock report on human fertilisation and embryology.
    Wells WT
    Lancet; 1984 Sep; 2(8401):531-2. PubMed ID: 6147600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Warnock report on human fertilization and embryology.
    J Adv Nurs; 1985 Jul; 10(4):375-84. PubMed ID: 3850104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. UK embryo research: embryo protection bill resurfaces.
    Clarke M
    Nature; 1985 Jun 13-19; 315(6020):534. PubMed ID: 4010770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human embryo experiments: societies urge a softer line.
    Beardsley T
    Nature; 1983 Apr; 302(5911):739. PubMed ID: 6843645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Council agrees response to Warnock report.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6463):255-6. PubMed ID: 11658545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Report from Council for Science and Society.
    Lancet; 1984 Jun; 1(8389):1290. PubMed ID: 6144987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legal and ethical aspects of new reproductive technologies.
    Andrews LB
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Mar; 29(1):190-204. PubMed ID: 3955927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Embryo research.
    Lancet; 1985 Feb; 1(8423):255-6. PubMed ID: 2857322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A welcome report.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Jul; 289(6439):207-8. PubMed ID: 6430410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro fertilisation: legislation and problems of research.
    Dawson K
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 Nov; 295(6607):1184-6. PubMed ID: 3120937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lords worry over Warnock.
    Russell W
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Nov; 289(6454):1321. PubMed ID: 11653633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why Warnock's 14-day rule may be unworkable.
    Connor S
    New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):6. PubMed ID: 11658553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.