These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6730934)

  • 1. Fetal heart rate response to a controlled sound stimulus as a measure of fetal well-being.
    Jensen OH
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1984; 63(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 6730934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring: value of sound stimulation.
    Trudinger BJ; Boylan P
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Feb; 55(2):265-8. PubMed ID: 7352091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal heart rate response to controlled sound stimuli during the third trimester of normal pregnancy.
    Jensen OH
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1984; 63(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 6730935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. VII. The impact of mode of delivery on fetal outcome.
    Krebs HB; Petres RE; Dunn LJ; Smith PJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 May; 143(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 7081332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory evoked responses in the human fetus. II. Modifications observed during labor.
    Luz NP
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1985; 64(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 4013684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Fetal acoustic stimulation test].
    Landa L; Alarcón H
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1982; 47(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 7184064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antepartum fetal heart rate response to sound stimulation: the acoustic stimulation test.
    Serafini P; Lindsay MB; Nagey DA; Pupkin MJ; Tseng P; Crenshaw C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Jan; 148(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 6691380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal heart rate response to a controlled sound stimulus after propranolol administration to the mother.
    Jensen OH
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1984; 63(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 6145290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Antepartum fetal evaluation by assessment of fetal heart rate and fetal movements.
    Sadovsky E; Weinstein D; Even Y
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1981 Mar; 19(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 6111492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal heart rate acceleration in response to acoustic stimulation as a measure of fetal well-being.
    Read JA; Miller FC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Nov; 129(5):512-7. PubMed ID: 910839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microprocessor-controlled doppler. A new fetal heart rate monitoring technique.
    Lauersen NH; Hochberg HM; George ME
    J Reprod Med; 1982 Jun; 27(6):352-5. PubMed ID: 7120215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antenatal evaluation of FHR accelerations associated with fetal movements.
    Sadovsky E; Navot D; Yaffe H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1981 Dec; 19(6):441-5. PubMed ID: 6121725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A six-point scoring system for antenatal cardiotocographs.
    Pearson JF; Weaver JB
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1978 May; 85(5):321-7. PubMed ID: 646966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A study on the correlation between automated fetal heart rate analysis and changes in umbilical cord arterial blood].
    Kato K
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Jul; 36(7):1027-33. PubMed ID: 6747386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study of fetal heart rate acceleration patterns.
    Lee CY; Di Loreto PC; O'Lane JM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Feb; 45(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 1118084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Continuing role of the nonstress test in the management of postdates pregnancy.
    Phelan JP; Platt LD; Yeh SY; Trujillo M; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Nov; 64(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 6493655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intrapartum vibroacoustic stimulation in cases of normal and abnormal fetal heart rate patterns.
    Ohel G; Simon A; Beyth Y; Sadovsky E
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1986; 21(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 3949252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A controlled trial of fetal heart rate monitoring in a low-risk obstetric population.
    Wood C; Renou P; Oats J; Farrell E; Beischer N; Anderson I
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Nov; 141(5):527-34. PubMed ID: 7294080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal heart rate variability: an approach to automated assessment.
    Huey JR; Paul RH; Hadjiev AA; Jilek J; Hon EH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Jul; 134(6):691-5. PubMed ID: 37735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The importance of a scoring system for positive contraction stress tests.
    Odendaal HJ; Bezuidenhout MM
    S Afr Med J; 1983 Oct; 64(19):741-4. PubMed ID: 6623285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.