These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6731510)

  • 1. Perinatal observations in a high-risk population managed without intrapartum fetal pH studies.
    Perkins RP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Jun; 149(3):327-36. PubMed ID: 6731510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies.
    Westgren M; Ingemarsson E; Ingemarsson I; Solum T
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 7422168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of scalp sampling on the cesarean section rate for fetal distress.
    Zalar RW; Quilligan EJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Sep; 135(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 38669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intrapartum fetal surveillance: the role of fetal scalp blood sampling.
    Clark SL; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Dec; 153(7):717-20. PubMed ID: 4073132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of unselected intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Lee WK; Baggish MS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 May; 47(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 1264397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes.
    Timonen S; Holmberg K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):620.e1-620.e7. PubMed ID: 29577914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy.
    Haverkamp AD; Thompson HE; McFee JG; Cetrulo C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jun; 125(3):310-20. PubMed ID: 5895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fetal heart rate monitoring in premature infants weighing 1,500 grams or less.
    Bowes WA; Gabre SG; Bowes C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 137(7):791-6. PubMed ID: 7405969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perinatal events and intraventricular/subependymal hemorrhage in the very low-birth weight infant.
    Strauss A; Kirz D; Modanlou HD; Freeman RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Apr; 151(8):1022-7. PubMed ID: 3985063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of fetal scalp blood pH on the incidence of cesarean section performed for fetal distress.
    Ayromlooi J; Garfinkel R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1980; 17(4):391-2. PubMed ID: 6102066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring on perinatal outcome and obstetric practices.
    Mueller-Heubach E; MacDonald HM; Joret D; Portman MA; Edelstone DI; Caritis SN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 137(7):758-63. PubMed ID: 7405966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electronic monitoring of fetal heart rate and determination of fetal scalp blood pH in prediction of intrapartum fetal distress.
    Dai MS; Fox H
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1991 Feb; 104(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 1874012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal distress and the condition of newborn infants.
    Sykes GS; Molloy PM; Johnson P; Stirrat GM; Turnbull AC
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Oct; 287(6397):943-5. PubMed ID: 6412897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal heart rate patterns and scalp blood pH as predictors of fetal distress.
    Katz M; Meizner I; Mazor M; Insler V
    Isr J Med Sci; 1981 Apr; 17(4):260-5. PubMed ID: 7239872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of obstetric factors in perinatal mortality trends.
    Iffy L; Bilenki I; Apuzzio JJ; Ganesh V; Sun SC; Thomas H; Erian M; Kaminetzky HA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1986 Apr; 24(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 2874086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective versus routine intrapartum monitoring: comparison of effects on perinatal outcome.
    Ballas S; Hornstein E; Jaffa AJ; Toaff R
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1980; 59(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 7445990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unstressed antepartum cardiotocography in the management of pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth retardation.
    Varma TR
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1984; 63(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 6730925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Fetal scalp blood sampling for pH and lactate measurement during labour].
    Carbonne B; Nguyen A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37 Suppl 1():S65-71. PubMed ID: 18179877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.