These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6731654)

  • 21. Numerosity discrimination: both time and number matter.
    Fetterman JG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1993 Apr; 19(2):149-64. PubMed ID: 8505595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What does the nature of the stimuli tell us about the Global Precedence Effect?
    Poirel N; Pineau A; Mellet E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17240344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factors responsible for performance on the day-night task: response set or semantics?
    Simpson A; Riggs KJ
    Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):360-71. PubMed ID: 15985070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Visual word recognition without central attention: evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age.
    Lien MC; Allen PA; Ruthruff E; Grabbe J; McCann RS; Remington RW
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):431-47. PubMed ID: 16953708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A systematic investigation of the functional neuroanatomy of auditory and visual phonological processing.
    Burton MW; Locasto PC; Krebs-Noble D; Gullapalli RP
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):647-61. PubMed ID: 15955475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Forward and backward repetition blindness in speed and accuracy.
    Wong KF; Chen HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):778-86. PubMed ID: 19485691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hemispheric asymmetries for spatial frequency discrimination in a selective attention task.
    Proverbio AM; Zani A; Avella C
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Jul; 34(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 9220094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On functional brain asymmetries in perceptual priming.
    Koivisto M
    Brain Cogn; 1995 Oct; 29(1):36-53. PubMed ID: 8845122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Garner interference reveals dependencies between emotional expression and gaze in face perception.
    Graham R; LaBar KS
    Emotion; 2007 May; 7(2):296-313. PubMed ID: 17516809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differentiation of holistic processing in the time course of letter recognition.
    Lachmann T; van Leeuwen C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 18586218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Graphemic and semantic similarity effects in the picture-word interference task.
    Rayner K; Springer CJ
    Br J Psychol; 1986 May; 77 ( Pt 2)():207-22. PubMed ID: 3730727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Are Arabic numerals processed as pictures in a Stroop interference task?
    Fias W; Reynvoet B; Brysbaert M
    Psychol Res; 2001 Nov; 65(4):242-9. PubMed ID: 11789428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Context and the allocation of resources in word recognition.
    Larochelle S; McClelland JL; Rodriguez E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Nov; 6(4):686-94. PubMed ID: 6449537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of blank time on picture recognition.
    Kallman HJ
    Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 6496811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Numerosity estimation with successive presentation: item organization.
    Ginsburg N; Riedel H
    J Gen Psychol; 1983 Apr; 108(2d Half):169-73. PubMed ID: 6854282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Further analysis of the Crist data on matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set.
    Pike R; Jackson K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1983 Sep; 112(3):347-56. PubMed ID: 6225827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Picture books, not readers! Teachers use the wrong modality in presentations and students in studying.
    Westman AS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):840-2. PubMed ID: 2377418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Experimenter naiveté and imaginal judgments.
    Intons-Peterson MJ; White AR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Aug; 7(4):833-43. PubMed ID: 6457095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Category and word search: generalizing search principles to complex processing.
    Fisk AD; Schneider W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1983 Apr; 9(2):177-95. PubMed ID: 6222141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Flower or rose? Differences in visual information processing of experts and amateurs].
    Zimmer HD
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1984; 136(4):343-61. PubMed ID: 6535539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.