346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6732693)
1. Subjective effects of combined-axis vibration: comparison of Y-axis and Y-plus-roll vibrations.
Shoenberger RW
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1984 May; 55(5):387-90. PubMed ID: 6732693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Subjective effects of combined-axis vibration: III. Comparison of Y-axis and Y-plus-yaw vibrations.
Shoenberger RW
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1986 Nov; 57(11):1075-81. PubMed ID: 3790026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Subjective effects of combined-axis vibration: II. Comparison of X-axis and X-plus-pitch vibrations.
Shoenberger RW
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1985 Jun; 56(6):559-63. PubMed ID: 4015568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychophysical assessment of angular vibration: comparison of vertical and roll vibrations.
Shoenberger RW
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1979 Jul; 50(7):688-91. PubMed ID: 486016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discomfort judgements of translational and angular whole-body vibrations.
Shoenberger RW
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1982 May; 53(5):454-7. PubMed ID: 7092753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychophysical comparison of vertical and angular vibrations.
Shoenberger RW
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1980 Aug; 51(8):759-62. PubMed ID: 7417141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intensity judgments of vibrations in the X axis, Z axis, and X-plus-Z axes.
Shoenberger RW
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1988 Aug; 59(8):749-53. PubMed ID: 3178624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intensity judgments of vibrations in the Y axis, Z axis, and Y-plus-Z axes.
Shoenberger RW
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1987 Aug; 58(8):783-7. PubMed ID: 3632539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intensity judgements of non-sinusoidal vibrations; support for the ISO weighting method.
Shoenberger RW
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1978 Nov; 49(11):1327-30. PubMed ID: 718578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subjective response to very low-frequency vibration.
Shoenberger RW
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1975 Jun; 46(6):785-90. PubMed ID: 1156284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the subjective intensity of sinusoidal, multifrequency, and random whole-body vibration.
Shoenberger RW
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1976 Aug; 47(8):856-62. PubMed ID: 949306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Equivalent sensation curves of simultaneous lateral and vertical sinusoidal whole-body vibration.
Broede P; Bruening T; Griefahn B
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1998 Oct; 69(10):986-91. PubMed ID: 9773901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptual scaling of whole-body low frequency linear oscillatory motion.
Golding JF; Benson AJ
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1993 Jul; 64(7):636-40. PubMed ID: 8357318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Motion sickness incidence induced by complex periodic waveforms.
Guignard JC; McCauley ME
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1982 Jun; 53(6):554-63. PubMed ID: 7115239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Examination of the frequency-weighting curve for accelerations measured on the seat and at the surface supporting the feet during horizontal whole-body vibrations in x- and y-directions.
Schust M; Kreisel A; Seidel H; Blüthner R
Ind Health; 2010; 48(5):725-42. PubMed ID: 20953088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical variability of the RT3 accelerometer.
Powell SM; Jones DI; Rowlands AV
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Oct; 35(10):1773-8. PubMed ID: 14523319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discomfort of seated persons exposed to low frequency lateral and roll oscillation: effect of seat cushion.
Beard GF; Griffin MJ
Appl Ergon; 2014 Nov; 45(6):1547-57. PubMed ID: 24947003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Seat vibration in military propeller aircraft: characterization, exposure assessment, and mitigation.
Smith SD
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Jan; 77(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 16422451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence on operator's health of hand-transmitted vibrations from handles of a single-axle tractor.
Goglia V; Gospodaric Z; Filipovic D; Djukic I
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2006; 13(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 16841869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. II. VOR and perceptual responses during combined Tilt&Translation.
Merfeld DM; Park S; Gianna-Poulin C; Black FO; Wood S
J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 94(1):199-205. PubMed ID: 15730979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
