These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6733070)
1. Evaluation of the Friedmann Visual Field Analyser Mark II. Part 2. Results from a population with induced visual field defects. Henson DB; Dix SM Br J Ophthalmol; 1984 Jul; 68(7):463-7. PubMed ID: 6733070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the Friedmann Visual Field Analyser Mark II. Part 1. Results from a normal population. Henson DB; Dix SM; Oborne AC Br J Ophthalmol; 1984 Jul; 68(7):458-62. PubMed ID: 6733069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Friedmann Visual Field Analyser Mark II--technical evaluation and clinical results. de Boer RW; van den Berg TJ; Beintema MR; Greve EL; Höppener J; Verduin WM Doc Ophthalmol; 1982 Dec; 53(4):331-42. PubMed ID: 7166100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Blue versus white stimuli in ocular hypertension with the Friedmann Mark 1 Visual Field Analyser. Hugkulstone CE; Vernon SA Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 4)():356-60. PubMed ID: 1478305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitation of glaucomatous visual field defects with the Mark II Friedmann analyzer. Hicks BC; Anderson DR Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 May; 95(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 6846460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How long will automated perimetry remain standard practice? Gutteridge IF Clin Exp Optom; 2005 Mar; 88(2):71-2. PubMed ID: 15807637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The screening of the central visual field. Krieglstein GK; Andrae K Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1975; 193(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 1078956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A clinical comparison of the Friedmann visual field analyser and tangent screen perimetry. Gutteridge IF Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1982 Feb; 59(2):184-94. PubMed ID: 7065111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The working threshold approach to Friedmann visual field analyser screening. Gutteridge IF Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1983; 3(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 6866521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of the Friedmann central field analyser in general optometric practice. Pitman CR Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1983; 3(2):153-66. PubMed ID: 6622037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The analysis of various extent visual field defect in chronic glaucoma patients]. Zhong Y; Ye W; Luo X Yan Ke Xue Bao; 2004 Dec; 20(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 15656362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Wishart PK Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():113-21. PubMed ID: 8325400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should visual field examination be a routine part of ophthalmic practice? Gutteridge IF Doc Ophthalmol; 1985 Jun; 59(4):323-39. PubMed ID: 4028922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a blue filter in visual field analysis. Hugkulstone CE; Vernon SA Br J Ophthalmol; 1991 Mar; 75(3):155-7. PubMed ID: 2012781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Introduction to the topic of functional assessment of sporadic visual field defects]. Zrenner E; Burmeister H Ophthalmologe; 2004 Oct; 101(10):1028-9. PubMed ID: 15338182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeated automatic visual field screening in a cohort study. Bengtsson B Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1985 Apr; 63(2):242-4. PubMed ID: 4003054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new index to monitor central visual field progression in glaucoma. de Moraes CG; Furlanetto RL; Ritch R; Liebmann JM Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug; 121(8):1531-8. PubMed ID: 24726202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of the Friedmann visual field analyser in detecting glaucoma damage]. Xu LA Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Mar; 25(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 2507257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Visual field changes in mesopic and scotopic conditions using Friedmann visual field analyser. III. Acquired chorioretinal diseases (author's transl)]. Hara T Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1979; 83(10):1976-84. PubMed ID: 546186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Automated and semiautomated perimetry. Comparative trial of 3 devices (Baylor programmer, Friedmann Mark II campimeter, Octopus 2000 R.)]. Pradines F; Delbosc B; Royer J J Fr Ophtalmol; 1985; 8(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 3891833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]