These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6733560)

  • 1. Controversies in mammography.
    Schechter S; Zuckerman HC
    Cancer Invest; 1984; 2(2):125-48. PubMed ID: 6733560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammography in the practice of medicine.
    Buchanan JB
    Int J Dermatol; 1980 Sep; 19(7):400-4. PubMed ID: 7419322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the hypothetical risk from mammography and evaluation of the potential benefit.
    Feig SA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1983 Mar; 21(1):173-91. PubMed ID: 6340151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammography-a time for caution.
    Bailar JC
    JAMA; 1977 Mar; 237(10):997-8. PubMed ID: 576257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Carcinogenic risk of mammography].
    Osipova VN
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1979 May; 24(5):74-8. PubMed ID: 374924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Controversies in breast cancer screening for women aged 40-49 years.
    Suzuki A; Ishida T; Ohuchi N
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2014 Jul; 44(7):613-8. PubMed ID: 24821976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The benefits and harms of mammography screening: understanding the trade-offs.
    Woloshin S; Schwartz LM
    JAMA; 2010 Jan; 303(2):164-5. PubMed ID: 20068211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening for early breast cancer: pros and cons.
    Bailar JC
    Cancer; 1977 Jun; 39(6 Suppl):2783-95. PubMed ID: 872066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk versus benefit in mammography.
    Lester RG
    Radiology; 1977 Jul; 124(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 866625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Critical notes on risk calculations in mammography (author's transl)].
    Würthner K
    Rontgenblatter; 1978 Jun; 31(6):318-22. PubMed ID: 675059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation hazard in mammography.
    Strax P
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1977; 12():247-50. PubMed ID: 918104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The mammography consensus jury speaks out.
    Nelson NJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Mar; 89(5):344-7. PubMed ID: 9060955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Risk-benefit analysis for mass screening of breast cancer utilizing mammography as a screening test].
    Iinuma TA; Tateno Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Sep; 49(9):1091-5. PubMed ID: 2587191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammography: a radiologist's view.
    Strax P
    CA Cancer J Clin; 1979; 29(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 110399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low-dose mammography. Application to medical practice.
    Feig SA
    JAMA; 1979 Nov; 242(19):2107-9. PubMed ID: 490795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of mammography screening.
    Conard FU; Mukherji B
    Conn Med; 1984 Mar; 48(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 6723295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammography screening for breast cancer: a view from 2 worlds.
    Murphy AM
    JAMA; 2010 Jan; 303(2):166-7. PubMed ID: 20068212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Potential hazards of mammography.
    Atkins CD
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Feb; 25(5):604; author reply 605. PubMed ID: 17290073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammography 1982: a statement of the American Cancer Society.
    CA Cancer J Clin; 1982; 32(4):226-31. PubMed ID: 6805868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medicine and public affairs. X-ray mammography--background to a decision.
    Greenberg DS
    N Engl J Med; 1976 Sep; 295(13):739-40. PubMed ID: 958259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.