BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6733904)

  • 1. Intercomparison of seven radioimmunoassay kits and a fluorescence polarization immunoassay kit for digoxin.
    Erickson KA; Green PJ
    Clin Chem; 1984 Jul; 30(7):1225-7. PubMed ID: 6733904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the fluorescence polarization immunoassay for quantitation of digoxin in serum.
    Al-Fares AM; Mira SA; el-Sayed YM
    Ther Drug Monit; 1984; 6(4):454-7. PubMed ID: 6515706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictive performance study of two digoxin assays in subjects with various degrees of renal function.
    Spinler SA; Al-Jazairi AS; Cheng JW; Kapoor S; Kobrin S; Shaw L
    Ther Drug Monit; 2000 Dec; 22(6):729-36. PubMed ID: 11128242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. False-positive serum digoxin concentrations determined by three digoxin assays in patients with liver disease.
    Frisolone J; Sylvia LM; Gelwan J; Pal S; Pellechia C
    Clin Pharm; 1988 Jun; 7(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 3402179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digoxin-like immunoreactive substance: monoclonal and polyclonal RIA and FPIA compared.
    Mojaverian P; Green PJ; Jhangiania RK; Chase GD
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 1989; 7(5):585-92. PubMed ID: 2490762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of the Abbott TDx fluorescence polarization immunoassay analyzer.
    Oeltgen PR; Shank WA; Blouin RA; Clark T
    Ther Drug Monit; 1984; 6(3):360-7. PubMed ID: 6390799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring endogenous digoxin-like substance and exogenous digoxin in the serum of low-birth-weight infants.
    Ng PK; LeGatt D; Coates J; Collins-Nakai RL
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1985 Sep; 42(9):1977-9. PubMed ID: 3901741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interference of digoxin-like immunoreactive substances with three digoxin immunoassays in patients with various degrees of renal function.
    Pleasants RA; Gadsden RH; McCormack JP; Piveral K; Sawyer WT
    Clin Pharm; 1986 Oct; 5(10):810-6. PubMed ID: 3780148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of protein concentration on the determination of digoxin in serum by fluorescence polarization immunoassay.
    Porter WH; Haver VM; Bush BA
    Clin Chem; 1984 Nov; 30(11):1826-9. PubMed ID: 6207958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [False results of measuring digoxin levels in patients with renal failure. Comparison of the RIA--FPIA methods].
    Jankowski A; Karwowski J; Marzec A; Kretowicz W; Nartowicz E
    Kardiol Pol; 1990 Feb; 33(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 2277482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digoxin-like immunoreactive substance in renal failure: a reappraisal.
    Greenway DC; Nanji AA
    Nephron; 1986; 44(2):108-10. PubMed ID: 3774074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lack of apparent effect of assay methodology on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin.
    Blum RA; DeVito JM; Pleasants RA; Crass RE; Gadsden RH; Leman RB
    Ther Drug Monit; 1987 Dec; 9(4):416-21. PubMed ID: 3424407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of digoxin Fab antibodies on five digoxin immunoassays.
    Ujhelyi MR; Cummings DM; Green P; Ellison MJ; Vlasses PH
    Ther Drug Monit; 1990 May; 12(3):288-92. PubMed ID: 2349615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analytical evaluation of TDx cyclosporine and metabolites fluorescence polarization immunoassay and comparison with the Cyclo-Trac RIA kit.
    Montojo C; Calvo MV; Domínguez-Gil A
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 1990 Feb; 15(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2180968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cyclosporine A monitoring in patients with renal, cardiac, and liver transplants: a comparison between fluorescence polarization immunoassay and two different RIA methods.
    Bergan S; Rugstad HE; Stokke O; Bentdal O; Frøysaker T; Bergan A
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1993 Aug; 53(5):471-7. PubMed ID: 8210969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enzyme-multiplied immunoassay (EMIT 2000) digoxin assay compared with fluorescence polarization immunoassay and amerlex 125I-radioimmunoassay at two Australian centers.
    Saccoia NC; Hackett LP; Morris RG; Ilett KF
    Ther Drug Monit; 1996 Dec; 18(6):672-7. PubMed ID: 8946664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of the CEDIA digoxin immunoassay.
    Murthy VV; Karmen A
    Clin Chem; 1990 Mar; 36(3):559-61. PubMed ID: 2107041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 immunoassay analyzer and comparison with enzyme immunoassay, fluorescence polarization immunoassay, and radioimmunoassay methods.
    Camara PD; Velletri K; Krupski M; Rosner M; Griffiths WC
    Clin Biochem; 1992 Aug; 25(4):251-4. PubMed ID: 1525980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variances in pharmacokinetic parameters due to assay methods for beta-methyldigoxin.
    Goto M; Suzuki A; Terashima T; Johno I; Kitazawa S
    J Pharmacobiodyn; 1987 May; 10(5):209-14. PubMed ID: 3305859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of whole-blood cyclosporine levels measured by radioimmunoassay and fluorescence polarization in patients post orthotopic liver transplant.
    Hooks MA; Millikan WJ; Henderson JM; Mullins R; Lampasona V
    Ther Drug Monit; 1989; 11(3):304-9. PubMed ID: 2658211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.