These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6735776)

  • 1. Single and double plane implants: a comparison of the Manchester System with the Paris System.
    Gillin MT; Kline RW; Wilson JF; Cox JD
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1984 Jun; 10(6):921-5. PubMed ID: 6735776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single- and double-plane iridium-192 interstitial implants: implantation guidelines and dosimetry.
    Kwan DK; Kagan AR; Olch AJ; Chan PY; Hintz BL; Wollin M
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 6888357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conformality and homogeneity of dose distributions in interstitial implants at idealized target volumes: a comparison between the Paris and dose-point optimized systems.
    Major T; Polgár C; Fodor J; Somogyi A; Németh G
    Radiother Oncol; 2002 Jan; 62(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 11830318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimetry rules for brachytherapy using high dose rate remote afterloading implants.
    Hoskin PJ; Rembowska A
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 1998; 10(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 9764373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uniform analysis of dose distribution in interstitial brachytherapy dosimetry systems.
    Paul JM; Koch RF; Philip PC
    Radiother Oncol; 1988 Oct; 13(2):105-25. PubMed ID: 3201001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between continuous and discrete sources in the Paris system of implants.
    Paul JM; Philip PC; Brandenburg RW; Koch RF
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(3):414-24. PubMed ID: 2739623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The application of dose-volume histograms to the Paris and Manchester systems of brachytherapy dosimetry.
    Langmack KA; Thomas SJ
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Jan; 68(805):42-8. PubMed ID: 7881882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison between tandem and ovoids and interstitial gynecologic template brachytherapy dosimetry using a hypothetical computer model.
    Hsu IC; Speight J; Hai J; Vigneault E; Phillips T; Pouliot J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Feb; 52(2):538-43. PubMed ID: 11872302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dosimetry of intraluminal brachytherapy.
    Marinello G; Pierquin B; Grimard L; Barret C
    Radiother Oncol; 1992 Apr; 23(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 1609124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Removable high intensity iridium-192 brain implants. Technique and in vivo measurements in canine brain.
    Sewchand W; Amin PP; Drzymala RE; Salazar OM; Salcman M; Samaras GM; Botero E
    J Neurooncol; 1984; 2(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 6502193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interstitial high dose-rate brachytherapy: principle, practice and first clinical experiences with a new remote-controlled afterloading system using Ir-192.
    Schulz U; Busch M; Bormann U
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1984 Jun; 10(6):915-20. PubMed ID: 6735775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can we compare systems for interstitial therapy?
    Dutreix A
    Radiother Oncol; 1988 Oct; 13(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 3201002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The guide gutter or loop techniques of interstitial implantation and the Paris system of dosimetry.
    Marinello G; Wilson JF; Pierquin B; Barret C; Mazeron JJ
    Radiother Oncol; 1985 Nov; 4(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 3841221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perineal template techniques for interstitial implantation of gynecological cancers using the Paris system of dosimetry.
    Leung S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1990 Sep; 19(3):769-74. PubMed ID: 2211225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the substitution of Ir-192 seed ribbons for wires in Paris system using dose nonuniformity ratio.
    Saw CB; Wu A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 Feb; 25(3):551-6. PubMed ID: 8436534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy assessment of the superposition principle for evaluating dose distributions of elongated and curved 103Pd and 192Ir brachytherapy sources.
    Bannon EA; Yang Y; Rivard MJ
    Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):2957-63. PubMed ID: 21815369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of HDR interstitial breast implants planned by conventional and optimized CT-based dosimetry systems with respect to dose homogeneity and conformality.
    Major T; Fodor J; Takácsi-Nagy Z; Agoston P; Polgár C
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Feb; 181(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 15702297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of geometrically optimized single- and double-plane interstitial high dose rate implants with respect to conformality and homogeneity.
    Major T; Polgár C; Fodor J; Takácsi-Nagy Z; Mangel L; Németh G
    Acta Oncol; 2003; 42(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 12665326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative dosimetry between iridium wires and seed ribbons.
    Marinello G; Valero M; Leung S; Pierquin B
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1985 Sep; 11(9):1733-9. PubMed ID: 4030441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of basal dose rates in Paris system of interstitial implants.
    Saw CB; Wu A
    Med Dosim; 1992; 17(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 1388680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.