These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 673627)
1. Relation of eye movements to errors on the Rod-and-Frame Test. Blowers GH; O'Connor KP Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Jun; 46(3 Pt 1):719-25. PubMed ID: 673627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lateral eye movements and field-dependence--independence. Hoffman C; Kagan S Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Dec; 45(3 Pt 1):767-78. PubMed ID: 600632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Eye movements during rod-and-frame performance. Haley GA Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Dec; 37(3):956-8. PubMed ID: 4764532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Relation of the frame in a portable rod-and-frame apparatus to judgements of perceived verticality. Blowers GH Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Feb; 44(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 840610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hemispheric correlates of the Rod-and-Frame test. Berlin DF; Languis ML Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Feb; 52(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 7232096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in the functional visual field during search with and without eye movements. Motter BC; Simoni DA Vision Res; 2008 Oct; 48(22):2382-93. PubMed ID: 18722398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of experience and short-term practice on drivers' eye movements and errors in simulated dangerous situations. Allen JA; Schroeder SR; Ball PG Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Dec; 47(3 Pt 1):767-76. PubMed ID: 740469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of geometrical structure on perception of the vertical in the Rod-and-Frame Test. Nybrog H Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Apr; 44(2):583-9. PubMed ID: 866066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Eye movements and sex differences in field articulation. Harley JP; Kalish DI; Silverman AJ Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Apr; 38(2):615-22. PubMed ID: 4824101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Subjective estimates of body tilt and the rod-and-frame test. Sigman E; Goodenough DR; Flannagan M Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Dec; 47(3 Pt 2):1051-6. PubMed ID: 745877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Field dependence and verbalized strategies on the portable rod-and-frame test by depressed outpatients and normal controls. Calamari E; Pini M; Puleggio A Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Dec; 91(3 Pt 2):1221-9. PubMed ID: 11219664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of field-dependent and field-independent subjects on a rod and frame discrimination task. Byrd GR; Paige SM; Guyot GW; Heck V Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 2):1089-92. PubMed ID: 2399084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sex differences in feedback: effects on Rod-and-Frame performance. Erdos G Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Jun; 48(3 Pt 2):1279-85. PubMed ID: 492901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Field-dependence, extraversion and perception of the vertical: empirical and theoretical perspectives of the rod-and-frame test. Fine BJ; Danforth AV Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Jun; 40(3):683-93. PubMed ID: 1178347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Field-dependence-independence and lateral eye movements following verbal and spatial questions. Ehrlichman H Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Jun; 44(3 Pt 2):1229-30. PubMed ID: 887376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptual style and dual-task performance as a function of task difficulty and task emphasis. Marincola LB; Long GM Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Dec; 61(3 Pt 2):1091-105. PubMed ID: 4094852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Field dependence and distraction revisited. Blowers GH Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Feb; 42(1):295-7. PubMed ID: 1256985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]