These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6736519)

  • 1. Withholding treatment: a legal perspective.
    Ball JR
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1984 Jul; 32(7):528-30. PubMed ID: 6736519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Termination of medical treatment: a judicial perspective.
    Ackerman JW; Pope MC
    J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 6981677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The legal response to Babies Doe: an analytical prognosis.
    Rosenblum VG; Grant ER
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):391-404. PubMed ID: 3636287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Canadian Charter of Rights and individual choice in treatment.
    Ferguson G
    Health Law Can; 1988; 8(3):63-70, 85. PubMed ID: 10312613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Legal advice, moral paralysis and the death of Samuel Linares.
    Nelson LJ; Cranford RE
    Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):316-24. PubMed ID: 2697788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of in-house counsel in decisions about withdrawal of life sustaining treatment.
    Wynstra NA
    Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 2628646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Linares affair.
    Lantos JD; Miles SH; Cassel CK
    Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 2628645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. State legislation and the handicapped newborn: a moral and political dilemma.
    Feldman E; Murray TH
    Law Med Health Care; 1984 Sep; 12(4):156-63. PubMed ID: 6565916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The federal role in protecting Babies Doe.
    Gerry MH; Nimz M
    Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):339-77. PubMed ID: 2954927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From the Johns Hopkins Baby to Baby Miller: what have we learned from four decades of reflection on neonatal cases?
    Paris JJ; Ferranti J; Reardon F
    J Clin Ethics; 2001; 12(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 11789063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Legal and ethical problems in decisions for death.
    Capron AM
    Law Med Health Care; 1986 Sep; 14(3-4):141-4, 157. PubMed ID: 3645223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What actually happened: an informed review of the Linares incident.
    Goldman GM; Stratton KM; Brown MD
    Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):298-307. PubMed ID: 2628644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Infant Doe regulations and the absolute requirement to use nourishment and fluids for the dying infant.
    Paris JJ; Fletcher AB
    Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):210-3. PubMed ID: 6557313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do the right thing: Samuel Linares and defensive law.
    Fost N
    Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 2628647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conjoined twins: the conflict between parents and the courts over the medical treatment of children.
    Tierney H
    Denver J Int Law Policy; 2002; 30(4):458-75. PubMed ID: 15233119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Termination of life support systems in the elderly. Discussion: To die before the gods please: legal issues surrounding euthanasia and the elderly.
    Baron CH
    J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1981; 14(1):45-70. PubMed ID: 7343584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. End-of-life decisions and the law.
    McLean S
    J Med Ethics; 1996 Oct; 22(5):261-2. PubMed ID: 8910775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critically ill newborns and the law. The American experience.
    Merrick JC
    J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):189-209. PubMed ID: 7636402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beyond autonomy: judicial restraint and the legal limits necessary to uphold the Hippocratic tradition and preserve the ethical integrity of the medical profession.
    Murphy JJ
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():451-84. PubMed ID: 10126946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Severely disabled newborns: to live or let die?
    Jackson CC
    J Leg Med; 1987 Mar; 8(1):135-76. PubMed ID: 11644153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.