These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6738014)

  • 1. A note on the blood analog for in-vitro testing of heart valve bioprostheses.
    Chandran KB; Khalighi B
    J Biomech Eng; 1984 May; 106(2):112-4. PubMed ID: 6738014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dependence of tissue valve leaflet motion on the viscosity of blood analogue fluid.
    Chandran KB; Fatemi R; Schoephoerster R
    Life Support Syst; 1986; 4(4):289-303. PubMed ID: 3561030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Durability of prosthetic heart valves.
    Clark RE; Swanson WM; Kardos JL; Hagen RW; Beauchamp RA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1978 Oct; 26(4):323-35. PubMed ID: 753145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality control of bioprosthetic heart valves by means of holographic interferometry.
    Deiwick M; Glasmacher B; Zarubin AM; Reul H; Geiger A; von Bally G; Stargardt A; Rau G; Scheld HH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jul; 5(4):441-7; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 8858512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer modelling of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Christie GW
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S95-100; discussion S101. PubMed ID: 1389288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of a glycerin-based blood analog on the testing of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Carey RF; Herman BA
    J Biomech; 1989; 22(11-12):1185-92. PubMed ID: 2625418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Primary tissue failure of bioprostheses: new evidence from in vitro tests.
    Deiwick M; Glasmacher B; Pettenazzo E; Hammel D; Castellón W; Thiene G; Reul H; Berendes E; Scheld HH
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Apr; 49(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 11339456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Haemodynamics and durability of mitral bioprostheses--an in vitro study.
    Gabbay S; Bortolotti U; Wasserman F; Factor SM
    Eur Heart J; 1984 Oct; 5 Suppl D():65-71. PubMed ID: 6240399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Bio-artificial organs: cardiac applications].
    Flameng W
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2004; 66(4):246-52. PubMed ID: 15553097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
    Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro hydrodynamic comparison of mitral valve prostheses at high flow rates.
    Gabbay S; McQueen DM; Yellin EL; Becker RM; Frater RW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978 Dec; 76(6):771-87. PubMed ID: 713584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Open aortic bioprosthesis at zero pressure. A new concept in glutaraldehyde fixation of tissue valve.
    Imamura E; Wada J
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1980; 21(5):617-24. PubMed ID: 7451570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are bioprostheses superior to mechanical valves?
    Schön HR; Unger B; Weingartner F; Sebening H; Blömer H
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():286-8. PubMed ID: 3727703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Where is the ideal heart valve substitute? What has frustrated its realization?
    Davila JC
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1989 Sep; 48(3 Suppl):S20-3. PubMed ID: 2673092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Opening and closure characteristics of different types of stented biological valves.
    Kuehnel RU; Pohl A; Puchner R; Wendt MO; Hartrumpf M; Pohl M; Albes JM
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Mar; 54(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 16541347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of Effective Orifice Areas of Mitral Prosthetic Heart Valves: An In-Vitro Study.
    Evin M; Magne J; Grieve SM; Rieu R; Pibarot P
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 Nov; 26(6):677-687. PubMed ID: 30207118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An assessment of the mechanical properties of leaflets from four second-generation porcine bioprostheses with biaxial testing techniques.
    Mayne AS; Christie GW; Smaill BH; Hunter PJ; Barratt-Boyes BG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Aug; 98(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 2755150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Continuous wave Doppler assessment of prosthetic valves in the mitral position: comparison of the St. Jude medical mechanical valve and the porcine xenograft valve].
    Kisanuki A; Tei C; Arikawa K; Natsugoe K; Otsuji Y; Kawazoe Y; Tanaka H; Morishita Y; Maruko M; Taira A
    J Cardiogr; 1985 Dec; 15(4):1119-27. PubMed ID: 3841894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative assessment of bioprosthesis durability in the aortic position.
    Grunkemeier GL; Bodnar E
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 Jan; 4(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 7742990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of fixation back pressure and antimineralization treatment on the morphology of porcine aortic bioprosthetic valves.
    Flomenbaum MA; Schoen FJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Jan; 105(1):154-64. PubMed ID: 8419696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.