These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6738014)

  • 21. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
    Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Carotid pulse curve in patients with prosthetic aortic heart valves (author's transl)].
    Schwab W; Raas E
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1980 Jul; 130(13-14):475-8. PubMed ID: 7424036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis of the design and dynamics of aortic bioprostheses in vivo.
    Thubrikar M; Skinner JR; Aouad J; Finkelmeier BA; Nolan SP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Aug; 84(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 7098513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hemodynamic performance and clinical consequences of aortic valve replacement with 21-mm sized pericardial bioprostheses.
    Boeken U; Litmathe J; Kurt M; Feindt P; Gams E
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 53(5):281-4. PubMed ID: 16208613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro testing of artificial heart valves: comparison between Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids.
    Pohl M; Wendt MO; Werner S; Koch B; Lerche D
    Artif Organs; 1996 Jan; 20(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 8645128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Exercise hemodynamics of bovine versus porcine bioprostheses: a prospective randomized comparison of the mosaic and perimount aortic valves.
    Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Keithahn A; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Wagner I; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 May; 129(5):1056-63. PubMed ID: 15867780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study.
    Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(5):960-3. PubMed ID: 18774723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
    Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Leaflet opening and closing dynamics of stentless bioprostheses.
    Frost MW; Funderl JA; Klaaborg KE; Wierup P; Sloth E; Nygaard H; Hasenkam JM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 Jul; 19(4):492-8. PubMed ID: 20845898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cardiac valve replacement: a bioengineering approach.
    Korossis SA; Fisher J; Ingham E
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):83-124. PubMed ID: 11086842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative analysis of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves after aortic valve replacement.
    Borkon AM; Soule LM; Baughman KL; Aoun H; Baumgartner WA; Gardner TJ; Watkins L; Gott VL; Reitz BA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Jul; 94(1):20-33. PubMed ID: 3600005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bioprostheses for cardiac valve replacement.
    Jamieson WR
    Can J Surg; 1985 Nov; 28(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 4063890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative in vitro evaluation of porcine and pericardial bioprostheses.
    Reul H; Giersiepen M; Schindehütte H; Effert S; Rau G
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():223-31. PubMed ID: 3727690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Considerations in the selection of cardiac prosthetic valves for children, tissue versus mechanical.
    Copeland JG; Mammana RB; Allen HD; Valdes-Cruz LM; Goldberg SJ
    Ariz Med; 1982 Apr; 39(4):239-41. PubMed ID: 7103760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. High speed photography of bioprosthetic heart valves during testing.
    Smith IR; Bottoms S; Stringfellow AM
    J Audiov Media Med; 1985 Oct; 8(4):131-2. PubMed ID: 4067188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tissue valves.
    Del Campo C
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1982 Jul; 34(1):108. PubMed ID: 7092394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Failure and hydrodynamic function testing of explanted pericardial and porcine bioprosthetic valves.
    Fisher J; Spyt TJ; Wheatley DJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1989; 203(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 2619837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Flexible bioprosthetic pericardial heart valve.
    Ross DN
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Apr; 28(2):150-2. PubMed ID: 6156502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Hemodynamic evaluation of long-term follow-up prosthetic valves in mitral position using Doppler ultrasound and echocardiography--with special reference to types and sizes].
    Yanagi H
    Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 Apr; 36(4):454-65. PubMed ID: 3047277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mechanical factors influencing the durability of heart valve pericardial bioprostheses.
    Gabbay S; Bortolotti U; Josif M
    ASAIO Trans; 1986; 32(1):282-7. PubMed ID: 3778723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.