These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6738037)

  • 1. Stimulus duration and frequency discrimination for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Hall JW; Wood EJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Jun; 27(2):252-6. PubMed ID: 6738037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency discrimination of short- versus long-duration tones by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Freyman RL; Nelson DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Mar; 30(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 3560895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal integration, frequency resolution, and off-frequency listening in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Hall JW; Fernandes MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1172-7. PubMed ID: 6643838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pitch discrimination and phase sensitivity in young and elderly subjects and its relationship to frequency selectivity.
    Moore BC; Peters RW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2881-93. PubMed ID: 1629481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency discrimination as a function of tonal duration and excitation-pattern slopes in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Freyman RL; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1034-44. PubMed ID: 3700858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monaural and binaural intensity discrimination in normal and cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Hall JW; Fernandes MA
    Audiology; 1983; 22(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 6615341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decision strategies of hearing-impaired listeners in spectral shape discrimination.
    Lentz JJ; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1389-98. PubMed ID: 11931316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Midfrequency dysfunction in listeners having high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Humes LE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Sep; 26(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 6645468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of Cochlear Damage on the Sensitivity to Harmonicity.
    Bonnard D; Dauman R; Semal C; Demany L
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 27992390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors influencing the masking level difference in cochlear hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Hall JW; Tyler RS; Fernandes MA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 6717000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency selectivity for hearing-impaired and broadband-noise-masked normal listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):543-64. PubMed ID: 1775656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency discrimination as a function of signal frequency and level in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Freyman RL; Nelson DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1371-86. PubMed ID: 1787719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1067-73. PubMed ID: 11519575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Level discrimination of single tones in a multitone complex by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Doherty KA; Lutfi RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Mar; 105(3):1831-40. PubMed ID: 10089606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin.
    Buus S; Florentine M; Poulsen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3464-80. PubMed ID: 10380670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age effects on measures of auditory duration discrimination.
    Fitzgibbons PJ; Gordon-Salant S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):662-70. PubMed ID: 8084196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Duration discrimination in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: effects of stimulus type and frequency.
    Grose JH; Hall JW; Buss E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Feb; 47(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 15072523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short-term temporal integration: evidence for the influence of peripheral compression.
    Oxenham AJ; Moore BC; Vickers DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3676-87. PubMed ID: 9193055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complex-Tone Pitch Discrimination in Listeners With Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Bianchi F; Fereczkowski M; Zaar J; Santurette S; Dau T
    Trends Hear; 2016 Sep; 20():. PubMed ID: 27604780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.