These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6740327)

  • 1. Test-tube embryology in the dock.
    Dickson D
    Science; 1984 Aug; 225(4662):606. PubMed ID: 6740327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assisted fertilization: legal restraints proposed for UK.
    Nature; 1984 Jul 26-Aug 1; 310(5975):266. PubMed ID: 6462211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recommendations of the Warnock Committee.
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):217-8. PubMed ID: 6146766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lords worry over Warnock.
    Russell W
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Nov; 289(6454):1321. PubMed ID: 11653633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The start of a long debate on the Warnock report.
    Deitch R
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):238. PubMed ID: 11644288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Warnock report on human fertilisation and embryology.
    Wells WT
    Lancet; 1984 Sep; 2(8401):531-2. PubMed ID: 6147600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. British government hedges bets on embryo research.
    Hadlington S
    Nature; 1987 Dec 3-9; 330(6147):409. PubMed ID: 3683559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Commons debates Warnock report.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Dec; 289(6458):1639. PubMed ID: 11652438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human embryo experiments: societies urge a softer line.
    Beardsley T
    Nature; 1983 Apr; 302(5911):739. PubMed ID: 6843645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Government seeks views on 'test-tube' babies.
    Vines G
    New Sci; 1986 Dec; 112(1539):3. PubMed ID: 11658779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology.
    Priest JA
    Mod Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 48(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 16100813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A welcome report.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Jul; 289(6439):207-8. PubMed ID: 6430410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Warnock report on human fertilisation and embryology.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):238-9. PubMed ID: 6146804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. IVF: regulation or prohibition?
    McLaren A
    Nature; 1989 Nov; 342(6249):469-70. PubMed ID: 2586619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990--how well is it functioning?
    Lieberman BA; Matson PL; Hamer F
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Sep; 9(9):1779-82. PubMed ID: 7836538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990.
    Great Britain
    Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Nov; No. 63():13-21. PubMed ID: 11651088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. UK agonizes on embryo research.
    Nature; 1985 Feb 7-13; 313(6002):424. PubMed ID: 3969148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproductive technology: in Britain, the debate after the Warnock Report.
    Gillon R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S16-8. PubMed ID: 11644023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Council agrees response to Warnock report.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6463):255-6. PubMed ID: 11658545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Report of inquiry into human fertilisation and embryology: Medical Research Council's response.
    Lancet; 1985 Feb; 1(8423):270. PubMed ID: 2857331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.