These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6740420)
21. Pregnancy in women using intra-uterine contraceptive devices. Henderson JM; Hull FM J R Coll Gen Pract; 1976 Feb; 26(163):147-9. PubMed ID: 1255551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Insertion of intra-uterine devices. Some technical considerations: II. Goldstuck ND Practitioner; 1982 Jul; 226(1369):1319-23. PubMed ID: 7111168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of uterine cavity size and shape: a systematic review addressing relevance to intrauterine procedures and events. Goldstuck N Afr J Reprod Health; 2012 Sep; 16(3):130-9. PubMed ID: 23437507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Method of measurement of the uterus with double intra-uterine probe]. Bromboszcz A; Sporek L; Sporek H Ginekol Pol; 1979; Suppl():106-7. PubMed ID: 548351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of uterine shape and size using Kurz's Cavimeter. de Castro A Adv Contracept; 1988 Jun; 4(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 3213668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Use of the Omega intrauterine contraceptive device in reconstructive operations on the uterine body]. Dmoch E; Kretowicz J Wiad Lek; 1988 Sep; 41(17):1138-40. PubMed ID: 3071904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Mark-7 intrauterine sound - an accurate determinant of uterine axial length. Goldstuck ND Contraception; 1979 Oct; 20(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 509961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Insertion and removal of intrauterine devices. Johnson BA Am Fam Physician; 2005 Jan; 71(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 15663031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [The problem of the lost intrauterine contraceptive device (author's transl)]. Hepp H Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1977 Aug; 37(8):653-9. PubMed ID: 902960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of a post-caesarian insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device on the involution of rat uterus. Kamboj VP; Singh MM; Chowdhury SR Indian J Exp Biol; 1976 May; 14(3):314-6. PubMed ID: 992773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of intrauterine devices on uterine structure in goats. I. Endometrial characteristics. Janakiraman K; Buch NC Indian J Exp Biol; 1973 May; 11(3):149-52. PubMed ID: 4782609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Empty-bladder (hysterographic) view on US for evaluation of intrauterine devices. Work in progress. Carroll R; Gombergh R Radiology; 1987 Jun; 163(3):822-3. PubMed ID: 3554346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Cavimeter. An instrument for measurement of the width of the uterine cavity]. Kurz KH Arch Gynecol; 1979 Jul; 228(1-4):269-70. PubMed ID: 485328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [The use of an intra-uterine contraceptive pessary in the treatment of women infertile due to uterine synechia]. Zwinger A; Schönfeld V; Mares J; Valenta M Zentralbl Gynakol; 1969 Jan; 91(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 5384764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Avoidance of the dimensional incompatibility as the main reason for side effects in intrauterine contraception. Kurz KH Contracept Deliv Syst; 1981 Jan; 2(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12278585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A critical ('stress') evaluation of the combined ML Copper 250-short IUD in nulliparous women. Goldstuck ND Contracept Deliv Syst; 1981 Oct; 2(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 12336989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Control of IUD-position (author's transl)]. Bernaschek G; Endler M; Beck A Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1981 Aug; 41(8):566-9. PubMed ID: 6912172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [A sonde for the more precise measurement of the length of the uterine cavity]. Nĕmec M Cesk Gynekol; 1969 Oct; 34(8):506. PubMed ID: 5354335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]