These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6741781)

  • 1. Sampling for formaldehyde in workplace and ambient air environments--additional laboratory validation and field verification of a passive air monitoring device compared with conventional sampling methods.
    Kring EV; Ansul GR; Basilio AN; McGibney PD; Stephens JS; O'Dell HL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 May; 45(5):318-24. PubMed ID: 6741781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory validation and field verification of a new passive air monitoring badge for sampling ethylene oxide in air.
    Kring EV; Damrell DJ; Basilio AN; McGibney PD; Douglas JJ; Henry TJ; Ansul GR
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Oct; 45(10):697-707. PubMed ID: 6496316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laboratory validation and field verification of a new passive colorimetric air monitoring badge for sampling hydrogen sulfide in air.
    Kring EV; Damrell DJ; Henry TJ; DeMoor HM; Basilio AN; Simon CE
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Jan; 45(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 6702591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Formaldehyde: a comparative evaluation of four monitoring methods.
    Coyne LB; Cook RE; Mann JR; Bouyoucos S; McDonald OF; Baldwin CL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1985 Oct; 46(10):609-19. PubMed ID: 4061291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monitoring of formaldehyde in air.
    Balmat JL; Meadows GW
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1985 Oct; 46(10):578-84. PubMed ID: 4061288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Field precision of formaldehyde sampling and analysis using NIOSH method 3500.
    Akbar-Khanzadeh F; Park CK
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Sep; 58(9):657-60. PubMed ID: 9291564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the Du Pont Pro-Tek Formaldehyde Badge and the 3M Formaldehyde Monitor.
    Kennedy ER; Hull RD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Feb; 47(2):94-105. PubMed ID: 3953425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory and field comparison of three methods for monitoring sulfur dioxide in air.
    Kring EV; Henry TJ; Damrell DJ; Bythewood TK
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Dec; 44(12):929-36. PubMed ID: 6660194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between active (pumped) and passive (diffusive) sampling methods for formaldehyde in pathology and histology laboratories.
    Lee EG; Magrm R; Kusti M; Kashon ML; Guffey S; Costas MM; Boykin CJ; Harper M
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Jan; 14(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 27715715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laboratory validation of five commercially available methods for sampling ethylene oxide in air.
    Kring EV; McGibney PD; Thornley GD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1985 Oct; 46(10):620-4. PubMed ID: 4061292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wood dust and formaldehyde exposures in the cabinet-making industry.
    Sass-Kortsak AM; Holness DL; Pilger CW; Nethercott JR
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Dec; 47(12):747-53. PubMed ID: 3799474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical modelling of formaldehyde occupational exposure levels in French industries, 1986-2003.
    Lavoué J; Vincent R; Gérin M
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Apr; 50(3):305-21. PubMed ID: 16371414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method for personal sampling and analysis of nanogram amounts of formaldehyde in air.
    Bisgaard P; Molhave L; Rietz B; Wilhardt P
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Jun; 45(6):425-9. PubMed ID: 6741798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A laboratory evaluation of two methods for measuring low levels of formaldehyde in indoor air.
    Petreas M; Twiss S; Pon D; Imada M
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 May; 47(5):276-80. PubMed ID: 3717011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Formaldehyde exposure in U.S. industries from OSHA air sampling data.
    Lavoue J; Vincent R; Gerin M
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Sep; 5(9):575-87. PubMed ID: 18618336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Video exposure assessments demonstrate excessive laboratory formaldehyde exposures.
    Ryan TJ; Burroughs GE; Taylor K; Kovein RJ
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Jun; 18(6):450-7. PubMed ID: 12746068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Kidney dialysis: ambient formaldehyde levels.
    Smith KA; Williams PL; Middendorf PJ; Zakraysek N
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Jan; 45(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 6702598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of gas and vapor sampling methods under field insult conditions.
    Chapman LM; Ward BG; Jeannot PM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Sep; 41(9):630-3. PubMed ID: 7457383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Formaldehyde emissions from wooden products and office furniture].
    Pecka I; Wiglusz R; Madeja-Grzyb A; Dziewanowska-Pudliszak A
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2001; 52(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 11452743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laboratory and field validation of the GC-NPD method for the measurement of formaldehyde in the workplace.
    Jeong JY; Paik NW
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 15788386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.