168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6741910)
1. Gastroenterology and the law.
Cifarelli PS
Am J Gastroenterol; 1984 Jul; 79(7):579-80. PubMed ID: 6741910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Exclusive contracts--a new court interpretation.
Manson JN
AANA J; 1982 Dec; 50(6):583-4. PubMed ID: 7164762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Exclusive contract case sets important antitrust precedent, considerations.
Halper HR
Bus Health; 1984 Sep; 1(9):52-3. PubMed ID: 10267657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. High court relaxes exclusive-contract antitrust rules in Hyde.
Reed TJ; Allen HS
Hospitals; 1984 Jun; 58(11):74-9. PubMed ID: 6724551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Supreme Court upholds exclusive contract in Hyde antitrust decision.
Reed TJ; Allen HS
Hosp Med Staff; 1984 May; 13(5):2-9. PubMed ID: 10266239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hospital topical law: medical staff privileges.
Morse HN
Hosp Top; 1985; 63(2):11, 15, 40. PubMed ID: 10271066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Law-medicine notes. Exclusive hospital-medical service arrangements for anesthesiology: antitrust consequences.
Curran WJ
N Engl J Med; 1984 Jul; 311(4):243-4. PubMed ID: 6738618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Court upholds Catholic hospital's right to close a service.
Kadzielski MA
Health Prog; 1989 Sep; 70(7):60. PubMed ID: 10294412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Exclusive agreement allows hospital to deny physician's staff appointment.
Horty J
Mod Healthc; 1986 Jun; 16(13):72. PubMed ID: 10276958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Government-funded hospital may require physician to accept indigent patients.
Regan WA
Hosp Prog; 1984 Jan; 65(1):58. PubMed ID: 10264663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Exclusive service contracts--a continuing source of anxiety.
Davis CD
Tex Hosp; 1979 Feb; 34(9):49. PubMed ID: 10240309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The U.S. Supreme Court looks at hospital-physician relationships: the Hyde decision.
Reed TJ; Allen HS
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1984; 29(3):36-49. PubMed ID: 10266558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Darling is alive and well in California.
Bernstein AH
Hospitals; 1982 Oct; 56(19):114, 116-7. PubMed ID: 7118110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Exclusive contracts with hospitals OK, Supreme Court rules.
Herrington BS
Psychiatr News; 1984 May; 19(9):1, 31. PubMed ID: 10266292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Health politics considerations of the covering physician system].
Huber HJ
Helv Chir Acta; 1990 Jan; 56(5):639-42. PubMed ID: 2323942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Expanded hospital liability: implications for the delineation of medical staff privileges.
Batty CR
Health Law Can; 1984; 4(4):92-102. PubMed ID: 10310690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Revocation of staff privileges: due process responsibilities.
Geiersbach SA
Mich Hosp; 1983 Mar; 19(3):13-6. PubMed ID: 10258813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Coastal Neuro-Psychiatric broadens state action exemption protection for hospital credentialing decisions.
Lipsetts PG
Health Law Vigil; 1986 Aug; 9(17):9-11. PubMed ID: 10278410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Bell v. Sharp Cabrillo Hospital: defining the hospital's level of corporate responsibility.
Chenen AR
Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(2):69-71. PubMed ID: 10104434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Court upholds law's immunities in peer review cases.
Kadzielski MA
Health Prog; 1990; 71(6):21, 31. PubMed ID: 10105569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
