These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6742021)

  • 1. The diagnosis of fetal microcephaly.
    Chervenak FA; Jeanty P; Cantraine F; Chitkara U; Venus I; Berkowitz RL; Hobbins JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Jul; 149(5):512-7. PubMed ID: 6742021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective study of the accuracy of ultrasound in predicting fetal microcephaly.
    Chervenak FA; Rosenberg J; Brightman RC; Chitkara U; Jeanty P
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jun; 69(6):908-10. PubMed ID: 3554067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic approach to fetal microcephaly.
    Leibovitz Z; Lerman-Sagie T
    Eur J Paediatr Neurol; 2018 Nov; 22(6):935-943. PubMed ID: 29970280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of microcephaly at birth using three reference ranges for fetal head circumference: can we improve prenatal diagnosis?
    Leibovitz Z; Daniel-Spiegel E; Malinger G; Haratz K; Tamarkin M; Gindes L; Schreiber L; Ben-Sira L; Lev D; Shapiro I; Bakry H; Weizman B; Zreik A; Egenburg S; Arad A; Tepper R; Kidron D; Lerman-Sagie T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 47(5):586-92. PubMed ID: 26511765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of ultrasound femur length and biparietal diameter in late pregnancy.
    Hohler CW; Quetel TA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Dec; 141(7):759-62. PubMed ID: 7315902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The femur length/head circumference relation in obstetric sonography.
    Hadlock FP; Harrist RB; Shah Y; Park SK
    J Ultrasound Med; 1984 Oct; 3(10):439-42. PubMed ID: 6387166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of a novel prenatal vertical cranial biometric measurement can improve accuracy of microcephaly diagnosis in utero.
    Leibovitz Z; Shiran C; Haratz K; Tamarkin M; Gindes L; Schreiber L; Malinger G; Ben-Sira L; Lev D; Shapiro I; Bakry H; Weizman B; Zreik A; Kidron D; Egenburg S; Arad A; Lerman-Sagie T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 47(5):593-9. PubMed ID: 26916564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal central nervous system biometry on MR imaging.
    Reichel TF; Ramus RM; Caire JT; Hynan LS; Magee KP; Twickler DM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):1155-8. PubMed ID: 12646474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Difficulties in the prenatal diagnosis of microcephaly.
    Bromley B; Benacerraf BR
    J Ultrasound Med; 1995 Apr; 14(4):303-6. PubMed ID: 7602690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrepancy in fetal head biometry between ultrasound and MRI in suspected microcephalic fetuses.
    Yaniv G; Katorza E; Tsehmaister Abitbol V; Eisenkraft A; Bercovitz R; Bader S; Hoffmann C
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1519-1527. PubMed ID: 28304179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determination of gestational age after the 24th week of gestation from fetal kidney length measurements.
    Konje JC; Abrams KR; Bell SC; Taylor DJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 12047540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
    Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cerebellar measurements with ultrasonography in the evaluation of fetal growth and development.
    Goldstein I; Reece EA; Pilu G; Bovicelli L; Hobbins JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 156(5):1065-9. PubMed ID: 3555086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal biometric ratios by transvaginal sonography as a marker for aneuploidies in early pregnancy.
    Guariglia L; Rosati P
    Prenat Diagn; 1997 May; 17(5):415-22. PubMed ID: 9178315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasound criteria for in utero diagnosis of microcephaly.
    Kurtz AB; Wapner RJ; Rubin CS; Cole-Beuglet C; Ross RD; Goldberg BB
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1980 Feb; 8(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 6766470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current status of fetal age and growth assessment.
    Chervenak FA; Jeanty P; Hobbins JC
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Dec; 10(3):423-44. PubMed ID: 6360462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation of biparietal and fetal body diameters: 12--26 weeks gestation.
    Sarti DA; Crandall BF; Winter J; Robertson RD; Kaback NM; Karp LE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Jul; 137(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 6787896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sonographic assessment of the fetal frontal lobe: a potential tool for prenatal diagnosis of microcephaly.
    Goldstein I; Reece EA; Pilu G; O'Connor TZ; Lockwood CJ; Hobbins JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 May; 158(5):1057-62. PubMed ID: 3369484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A sonographic screening method for Down syndrome.
    Lockwood C; Benacerraf B; Krinsky A; Blakemore K; Belanger K; Mahoney M; Hobbins J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Oct; 157(4 Pt 1):803-8. PubMed ID: 2960238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Normal range growth curves for fetal biparietal diameter, occipito frontal diameter, mean abdominal diameters and femur length.
    Persson PH; Weldner BM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1986; 65(7):759-61. PubMed ID: 3544662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.