These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6742097)
1. Predicting visual resolution from detection thresholds. Adams AJ; Haegerstrom-Portnoy G; Brown B; Jampolsky A Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1984 Jun; 61(6):371-6. PubMed ID: 6742097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting visual acuity from detection thresholds. Newacheck JS; Haegerstrom-Portnoy G; Adams AJ Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Mar; 67(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 2320362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Real-time rapid acuity assessment using VEPs: development and validation of the step VEP technique. Mackay AM; Bradnam MS; Hamilton R; Elliot AT; Dutton GN Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 49(1):438-41. PubMed ID: 18172123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity and reliability of visual acuity measurements. Lovie-Kitchin JE Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 3253626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual acuity testing. From the laboratory to the clinic. Bailey IL; Lovie-Kitchin JE Vision Res; 2013 Sep; 90():2-9. PubMed ID: 23685164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vanishing Optotype acuity: repeatability and effect of the number of alternatives. Shah N; Dakin SC; Redmond T; Anderson RS Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2011 Jan; 31(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 21158882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quick assessment of preferential looking acuity in infants. Gwiazda J; Wolfe JM; Brill S; Mohindra I; Held R Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1980 Jul; 57(7):420-7. PubMed ID: 7406010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Foveal and peripheral thresholds for detection and resolution of vanishing optotype tumbling E's. Anderson RS; Ennis FA Vision Res; 1999; 39(25):4141-4. PubMed ID: 10755151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of vision in young children: a new operant approach yields estimates of acuity. Mayer DL; Dobson V Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1980 May; 19(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 7372418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual acuity for optotypes made visible by relative motion. Regan D; Hong XH Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Jan; 67(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 2308752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repeated visual acuity measurement: establishing the patient's own criterion for change. Brown B; Lovie-Kitchin J Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Jan; 70(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 8430008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual acuity of the preschool child: a review. Fern KD; Manny RE Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 May; 63(5):319-45. PubMed ID: 3717284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Grating Discs: a simplified method of testing vision in infants and young children. Katsumi O; Hirose T; Okuno H; Miyanaga Y Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1990 Jun; 68(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 2392898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity of the S cone pathway: preliminary measures with letter charts. Rabin J; Adams AJ Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Nov; 67(11):799-802. PubMed ID: 2250885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Standard measures of visual acuity do not predict drivers' recognition performance under day or night conditions. Wood JM; Owens DA Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 82(8):698-705. PubMed ID: 16127335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of visual acuity via a telephone interview. DeiCas R; Street DA; Javitt JC Arch Ophthalmol; 1992 Sep; 110(9):1279-82. PubMed ID: 1520117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]