These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6742980)

  • 1. Clinical judgments in the decision to commit. Psychiatric discretion and the law.
    Schwartz HI; Appelbaum PS; Kaplan RD
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1984 Aug; 41(8):811-5. PubMed ID: 6742980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decision to seek commitment. Psychiatric decision making in a legal context.
    Appelbaum PS; Hamm RM
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1982 Apr; 39(4):447-51. PubMed ID: 7065852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Commitment: the consistency of clinicians and the use of legal standards.
    Lidz CW; Mulvey EP; Appelbaum PS; Cleveland S
    Am J Psychiatry; 1989 Feb; 146(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 2912259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Civil commitment in Turkey: reflections on a bill drafted by psychiatrists.
    Arikan R; Appelbaum PS; Sercan M; Turkcan S; Satmis N; Polat A
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 16844221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decision making in psychiatric civil commitment: an experimental analysis.
    Bagby RM; Thompson JS; Dickens SE; Nohara M
    Am J Psychiatry; 1991 Jan; 148(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 1984703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Limitations on psychiatrists' discretionary civil commitment authority by the Stone and dangerousness criteria.
    Hoge SK; Sachs G; Appelbaum PS; Greer A; Gordon C
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1988 Aug; 45(8):764-9. PubMed ID: 3395207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The paradoxical impact of a commitment statute on prediction of dangerousness.
    Beigel A; Berren MR; Harding TW
    Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Mar; 141(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 6703101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Supreme Court looks at psychiatry.
    Appelbaum PS
    Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):827-35. PubMed ID: 6731630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An empirical comparison of the stone and dangerousness criteria for civil commitment.
    Hoge SK; Appelbaum PS; Greer A
    Am J Psychiatry; 1989 Feb; 146(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 2912258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. APA's model law: a commitment code by and for psychiatrists.
    Wexler DB
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Sep; 36(9):981-3. PubMed ID: 4065859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Legal conceptualizations, legal fictions, and the manipulation of reality: conflict between models of decision making in psychiatry and law.
    Gutheil TG; Mills MJ
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 6128038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of clinical and judicial procedures for reviewing requests for involuntary medication in New York.
    Cournos F; McKinnon K; Adams C
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1988 Aug; 39(8):851-5. PubMed ID: 3209200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment.
    Grant GM
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. APA's model law: hurting the people it seeks to help.
    Rubenstein LS
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Sep; 36(9):968-72. PubMed ID: 4065856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The obviously ill patient in need of treatment: a fourth standard for civil commitment.
    Treffert DA
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 36(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 3979975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dangerousness and commitment of the mentally disordered in the United States.
    Monahan J; Shah SA
    Schizophr Bull; 1989; 15(4):541-53. PubMed ID: 2696085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. More positive supreme court views on psychiatry.
    Kennelly DJ
    Am J Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 142(3):387-8. PubMed ID: 3970284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Need for treatment and New York's revised commitment laws: an empirical assessment.
    Mestrovic S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 6642827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Process analysis of judges' commitment decisions: a preliminary empirical study.
    Bursztajn H; Gutheil TG; Mills M; Hamm RM; Brodsky A
    Am J Psychiatry; 1986 Feb; 143(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 3946649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The test of compulsion in mental health law: capacity, therapeutic benefit and dangerousness as possible criteria.
    Bartlett P
    Med Law Rev; 2003; 11(3):326-52. PubMed ID: 16733878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.