BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6743980)

  • 21. Colorectal carcinoma: evaluation of histologic grade and factors influencing prognosis.
    Chung CK; Zaino RJ; Stryker JA
    J Surg Oncol; 1982 Nov; 21(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 7132366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A 5- to 21-year follow-up and analysis of 250 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma.
    Michelassi F; Block GE; Vannucci L; Montag A; Chappell R
    Ann Surg; 1988 Sep; 208(3):379-89. PubMed ID: 3421761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prognostic significance of vascular invasion in colorectal cancer of Dukes' B class.
    Khankhanian N; Mavligit GM; Russell WO; Schimek M
    Cancer; 1977 Mar; 39(3):1195-200. PubMed ID: 912654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lateral lymph node dissection for rectal carcinoma below the peritoneal reflection.
    Moreira LF; Hizuta A; Iwagaki H; Tanaka N; Orita K
    Br J Surg; 1994 Feb; 81(2):293-6. PubMed ID: 8156366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Application of Petersen Index score for Dukes'B colorectal cancer in a population of 103 consecutive resected patients.
    Cerullo G; Cassini D; Baldazzi G
    Updates Surg; 2012 Jun; 64(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 22460519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Extent of mesorectal spread and involvement of lateral resection margin as prognostic factors after surgery for rectal cancer.
    Cawthorn SJ; Parums DV; Gibbs NM; A'Hern RP; Caffarey SM; Broughton CI; Marks CG
    Lancet; 1990 May; 335(8697):1055-9. PubMed ID: 1691810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improvement of 10-year survival by Japanese radical lymph node dissection in patients with Dukes' B and C colorectal cancer: a 17-year retrospective study.
    Mukai M; Ito I; Mukoyama S; Tajima T; Saito Y; Nakasaki H; Sato S; Makuuchi H
    Oncol Rep; 2003; 10(4):927-34. PubMed ID: 12792747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinicopathologic study of gastric cancer based on Dukes' classification.
    Adachi Y; Suematsu T; Yasuda K; Shiromizu A; Shiraishi N; Kitano S
    World J Surg; 1999 May; 23(5):499-502. PubMed ID: 10085400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Densitometric evaluation of DNA content in colorectal cancer.
    Matturri L; Biondo B; Uggeri F; Lavezzi AM
    Eur J Cancer; 1991; 27(7):893-6. PubMed ID: 1834123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patterns of recurrence of rectal cancer after potentially curative surgery.
    Rich T; Gunderson LL; Lew R; Galdibini JJ; Cohen AM; Donaldson G
    Cancer; 1983 Oct; 52(7):1317-29. PubMed ID: 6192900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tumor size and regional lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. A preliminary analysis from the NSABP clinical trials.
    Wolmark N; Cruz I; Redmond CK; Fisher B; Fisher ER
    Cancer; 1983 Apr; 51(7):1315-22. PubMed ID: 6337699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical staging of rectal cancer.
    Abrams JS
    Am J Surg; 1980 Apr; 139(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 7369461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Surgical treatment and late results in 1226 cases of colorectal cancer.
    Zhou XG; Yu BM; Shen YX
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1983 Apr; 26(4):250-6. PubMed ID: 6839896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Survival in patients with large-bowel cancer. A population-based investigation from the Melbourne Colorectal Cancer Study.
    Kune GA; Kune S; Field B; White R; Brough W; Schellenberger R; Watson LF
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1990 Nov; 33(11):938-46. PubMed ID: 2226081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lymphoid hyperplasia: a major prognostic feature in 519 cases of colorectal carcinoma.
    Pihl E; Nairn RC; Milne BJ; Cuthbertson AM; Hughes ES; Rollo A
    Am J Pathol; 1980 Aug; 100(2):469-80. PubMed ID: 7406021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Number and size of lymph nodes recovered from dukes B rectal cancers: correlation with prognosis and histologic antitumor immune response.
    Murphy J; Pocard M; Jass JR; O'Sullivan GC; Lee G; Talbot IC
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Oct; 50(10):1526-34. PubMed ID: 17828403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The clinical significance of invasion of veins by rectal cancer.
    Talbot IC; Ritchie S; Leighton MH; Hughes AO; Bussey HJ; Morson BC
    Br J Surg; 1980 Jun; 67(6):439-42. PubMed ID: 7388345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dukes' classification revisited. Findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Projects (Protocol R-01).
    Fisher ER; Sass R; Palekar A; Fisher B; Wolmark N
    Cancer; 1989 Dec; 64(11):2354-60. PubMed ID: 2804927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Independent prognostic value of ploidy in colorectal cancer. A prospective study using image cytometry.
    Albe X; Vassilakos P; Helfer-Guarnori K; Givel JC; de Quay N; Suardet L; Eliason JF; Odartchenko N
    Cancer; 1990 Sep; 66(6):1168-75. PubMed ID: 2400968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Staging of colorectal cancer. The Australian clinico-pathological staging (ACPS) system compared with Dukes' system.
    Davis NC; Evans EB; Cohen JR; Theile DE
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1984 Nov; 27(11):707-13. PubMed ID: 6499604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.