BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6744685)

  • 1. Comparison of the effects of D-amphetamine on FI and DRL schedule performance of self-stimulating rats.
    Nalwa V; Rao PS
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1984; 11(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 6744685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Timing and space usage are disrupted by amphetamine in rats maintained on DRL 24-s and DRL 72-s schedules of reinforcement.
    Fowler SC; Pinkston J; Vorontsova E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2009 Jun; 204(2):213-25. PubMed ID: 19142629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acute effects of d-amphetamine on the differential reinforcement of low-rate (DRL) schedule behavior in the rat: comparison with selective dopamine receptor antagonists.
    Liao RM; Cheng RK
    Chin J Physiol; 2005 Mar; 48(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 15973966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of d-amphetamine and of beta-phenylethylamine on fixed interval responding maintained by self-regulated lateral hypothalamic stimulation in rats.
    Greenshaw AJ; Sanger DJ; Blackman DE
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1985 Oct; 23(4):519-23. PubMed ID: 4070329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methylphenidate and d-amphetamine: effects and interactions with alphamethyltyrosine and tetrabenazine on DRL performance in rats.
    Seiden LS; Andresen J; MacPhail RC
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1979 Apr; 10(4):577-84. PubMed ID: 572553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the effects of clozapine, haloperidol, chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine on performance on a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule and on locomotor behaviour in the rat.
    Mobini S; Chiang TJ; Ho MY; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2000 Sep; 152(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11041315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of chronic d-amphetamine treatment on schedule-controlled behavior.
    Harris RA; Snell D; Loh HH
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1979 May; 63(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 112622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DRL performance in 6-hydroxydopamine-treated rats.
    Levine TE; McGuire PS; Heffner TG; Seiden LS
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1980 Feb; 12(2):287-91. PubMed ID: 7375491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. d-amphetamine and fixed-interval performance: effects of operant history.
    Urbain C; Poling A; Millam J; Thompson T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 May; 29(3):385-92. PubMed ID: 670855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of d-amphetamine on operant behaviour maintained under variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.
    Morley MJ; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1985; 87(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 3931148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of d-amphetamine and caffeine on schedule-controlled and schedule-induced responding.
    McMillan DE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Nov; 32(3):445-56. PubMed ID: 512573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of phencyclidine, d-amphetamine and pentobarbital on schedule-controlled behavior in rats.
    Segal SA; Moerschbaecher JM; Thompson DM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1981 Nov; 15(5):807-12. PubMed ID: 7312916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The interaction of d-amphetamine and naloxone differs for rats trained on separate fixed-interval or fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement.
    Andrews JS; Holtzman SG
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1987 Jan; 26(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 3562487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of cinanserin and p-chlorophenylalanine and their interaction with d-amphetamine on DRL performance in rats.
    Mele PC; Caplan MA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1980 Jun; 12(6):883-91. PubMed ID: 6447298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vasopressin has general rate-decreasing effects on schedules maintaining either high or low response rates.
    van Haaren F; Heinsbroek RP; Louwerse A; van de Poll NE
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1986; 89(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 3090595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attenuation by pimozide of the suppressant effect of d-amphetamine on operant behaviour.
    Morley MJ; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1987; 91(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 3107040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anatomical specificity within rat striatum for the dopaminergic modulation of DRL responding and activity.
    Neill DB; Herndon JG
    Brain Res; 1978 Sep; 153(3):529-38. PubMed ID: 698792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Some determinants of remote behavioral history effects in humans.
    Hirai M; Okouchi H; Matsumoto A; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Nov; 96(3):387-415. PubMed ID: 22084497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethanol-amphetamine interaction effects on spontaneous motor activity and fixed-interval responding.
    Duncan PM; Cook NJ
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1981; 74(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 6791234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine on schedule-controlled and schedule-related behavior of rabbits.
    Barrett JE; Stanley JA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1982; 78(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 6818576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.