These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6746263)

  • 1. Development of optimized epoxy graphite implant for the total hip joint.
    Iyer LS; Jayasekaran T; Blunck CF; Selvam RP
    ISA Trans; 1984; 23(2):7-14. PubMed ID: 6746263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty.
    Cheal EJ; Spector M; Hayes WC
    J Orthop Res; 1992 May; 10(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 1569504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conus hip prosthesis.
    Wagner H; Wagner M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of wear in composite material orthopaedic implants. Part II: The implant/bone interface.
    Albert K; Schledjewski R; Harbaugh M; Bleser S; Jamison R; Friedrich K
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(3):199-211. PubMed ID: 7950869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of optimized epoxy graphite implant for the total hip joints.
    Iyer LS; Jayasekaran T; Blunck CF; Selvam RP
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1983; 19():57-70. PubMed ID: 6871332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of design parameters on calcar stresses following femoral head arthroplasty.
    Cook SD; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Mar; 14(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 7358741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Experimental protocol for mechanical characterization of a femoral implant of carbon-Peek composite hip prosthesis in fatigue].
    Soyer J
    Chirurgie; 1997 Jan; 121(9-10):658-62. PubMed ID: 9138327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of variation of cement thickness on bone and cement stress at the tip of a femoral implant.
    Lee IY; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
    Iowa Orthop J; 1993; 13():155-9. PubMed ID: 7820736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of the effects of different materials in a tooth implant-supported fixed prosthesis using finite element method.
    Dargahi J; Najarian S; Talebi M
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(4):317-31. PubMed ID: 16010040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
    Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A method of quantification of stress shielding in the proximal femur using hierarchical computational modeling.
    Be'ery-Lipperman M; Gefen A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 16880155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficient computational method for assessing the effects of implant positioning in cementless total hip replacements.
    Bah MT; Nair PB; Taylor M; Browne M
    J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(7):1417-22. PubMed ID: 21295306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress distribution on the metal framework of the implant-supported fixed prosthesis using different veneering materials.
    Ciftçi Y; Canay S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):406-11. PubMed ID: 12066633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of FE idealisation, load conditions and interface assumptions on the stress distribution and fatigue notch factor in the human femur with an endoprosthesis.
    Hedia HS; Barton DC; Fisher J; Elmidany TT
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 8922259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probabilistic analysis of peri-implant strain predictions as influenced by uncertainties in bone properties and occlusal forces.
    Petrie CS; Williams JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 17590159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.