70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 674651)
21. [Flat Panel Detector Philips introduced and its system direction].
Yamada S
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 12766268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sensitivity of radiographic screens to scattered radiation and its relationship to image contrast.
Castle JW
Radiology; 1977 Mar; 122(3):805-9. PubMed ID: 841075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. National survey with regard to preferred image characteristics of various types of intensifying screens.
van der Zwaag H
Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1984; 53(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 6565544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Recent developments in x-ray luminescent imaging systems].
Gurvic AM; Wolf M; Starick D
Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990; 31(4):401-8. PubMed ID: 2236548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The relationship between resolution and speed of x-ray intensifying screens.
Rao GU; Fatouros P
Med Phys; 1978; 5(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 672813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The energy-dependent behavior of noise Wiener spectra in their low-frequency limits: comparison with simple theory.
Vyborny CJ; Loo LN; Doi K
Radiology; 1982 Aug; 144(3):619-22. PubMed ID: 7100480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Basic parameters and testing methods for medical roentgen screens].
Gurvich AM; Il'ina MA; Katomina RV
Med Tekh; 1987; (6):38-44. PubMed ID: 3326993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparative evaluation of rare-earth screen-film systems. System speed, contrast, sensitometry, RMS noise, square-wave response function, and contrast-dose-detail analysis.
Fearon T; Vucich J; Hoe J; McSweeney WJ; Potter BM
Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):654-62. PubMed ID: 3744739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative performance of x-ray-intensifying screens.
Burgess AE; Hicken P
Radiology; 1982 May; 143(2):551-6. PubMed ID: 7071362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [A gamma-ray sensitometer for film-screen combinations in diagnostic radiology].
Nowotny R; Bliem J
Rontgenblatter; 1985 Apr; 38(4):117-20. PubMed ID: 4001775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A method to evaluate the performance of X-ray imaging scintillators by means of the brightness-sharpness index (BSI).
Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Prassopoulos P; Kanellopoulos E; Nomicos CD; Panayiotakis GS
Acta Radiol; 1999 Mar; 40(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 10080737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Experimental study of intensifying screens used in diagnostic radiography (author's transl)].
de Moras Y; Lucas P; Fauduet A; Pelgas MF; Serrurot M; Bausmayer J
J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1978 Mar; 59(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 650634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Digital roentgenographic systems based on photostimulated screens and their comparison with roentgenographic screen-film sets].
Gorelik FG; Stankevich NE
Med Tekh; 2006; (5):10-3. PubMed ID: 17133936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Energy absorbed in calcium tungstate x-ray screens.
Shuping RE; Judy PF
Med Phys; 1977; 4(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 882059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
