These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6747109)

  • 1. Recognition of speech spectrograms.
    Greene BG; Pisoni DB; Carrell TD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 6747109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories.
    Lively SE; Logan JS; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1242-55. PubMed ID: 8408964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of talker variability on perceptual learning of dialects.
    Clopper CG; Pisoni DB
    Lang Speech; 2004; 47(Pt 3):207-39. PubMed ID: 15697151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some consequences of stimulus variability on speech processing by 2-month-old infants.
    Jusczyk PW; Pisoni DB; Mullennix J
    Cognition; 1992 Jun; 43(3):253-91. PubMed ID: 1643815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL; DeSteno D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):544-52. PubMed ID: 12558290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual learning of multiple talkers: Determinants, characteristics, and limitations.
    Cummings SN; Theodore RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Oct; 84(7):2335-2359. PubMed ID: 36076119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal cues for consonant recognition: training, talker generalization, and use in evaluation of cochlear implants.
    Van Tasell DJ; Greenfield DG; Logemann JJ; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1247-57. PubMed ID: 1401513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wave collation visual speech display: design and evaluation.
    Mitchell PA; Easton RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1297-306. PubMed ID: 7876449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of overnight consolidation in the perceptual learning of non-native tonal contrasts.
    Qin Z; Zhang C
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0221498. PubMed ID: 31830045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories.
    Lively SE; Pisoni DB; Yamada RA; Tohkura Y; Yamada T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2076-87. PubMed ID: 7963022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generalization of Perceptual Learning of Degraded Speech Across Talkers.
    Huyck JJ; Smith RH; Hawkins S; Johnsrude IS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 60(11):3334-3341. PubMed ID: 28979990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Generalization of tactile perceptual skills to new context following tactile-alone word recognition training with the Tickle Talker.
    Galvin KL; Blamey PJ; Cowan RS; Oerlemans M; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Dec; 108(6):2969-79. PubMed ID: 11144589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time and information in perceptual adaptation to speech.
    Choi JY; Perrachione TK
    Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103982. PubMed ID: 31229740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in talker recognition by preschoolers and adults.
    Creel SC; Jimenez SR
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Dec; 113(4):487-509. PubMed ID: 22958962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech perception by infants: categorization based on nasal consonant place of articulation.
    Hillenbrand J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 May; 75(5):1613-22. PubMed ID: 6736425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of talker variability on word recognition in preschool children.
    Ryalls BO; Pisoni DB
    Dev Psychol; 1997 May; 33(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 9149923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of computer-based auditory training in improving the perception of noise-vocoded speech.
    Stacey PC; Summerfield AQ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):2923-35. PubMed ID: 17550190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of talker-specific information in word segmentation by infants.
    Houston DM; Jusczyk PW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Oct; 26(5):1570-82. PubMed ID: 11039485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning a Talker or Learning an Accent: Acoustic Similarity Constrains Generalization of Foreign Accent Adaptation to New Talkers.
    Xie X; Myers EB
    J Mem Lang; 2017 Dec; 97():30-46. PubMed ID: 28890602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.