These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6747111)
1. Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis. Hall JW; Haggard MP; Fernandes MA J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 6747111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comodulation masking release as a function of bandwidth and time delay between on-frequency and flanking-band maskers. Moore BC; Schooneveldt GP J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):725-31. PubMed ID: 2212296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comodulation masking release as a function of bandwidth and test frequency. Haggard MP; Hall JW; Grose JH J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jul; 88(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 2380439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of across-frequency differences in masking level on spectro-temporal pattern analysis. Hall JW J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):781-7. PubMed ID: 3958319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration. Schooneveldt GP; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):273-81. PubMed ID: 2921409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Temporal decline of masking and comodulation detection differences. McFadden D; Wright BA J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):711-24. PubMed ID: 2212295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comodulation masking release for single and multiple rates of envelope fluctuation. Eddins DA; Wright BA J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Dec; 96(6):3432-42. PubMed ID: 7814760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Profile analysis and comodulation detection differences using narrow bands of noise and their relation to comodulation masking release. Fantini DA; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2180-91. PubMed ID: 8201114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of modulation coherence on signal threshold in frequency-modulated noise bands. Grose JH; Hall JW J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):703-10. PubMed ID: 2212294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Temporal decline of masking and comodulation masking release. McFadden D; Wright BA J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jul; 92(1):144-56. PubMed ID: 1512320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence that comodulation detection differences depend on within-channel mechanisms. Borrill SJ; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):309-19. PubMed ID: 11833537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relative contributions of envelope maxima and minima to comodulation masking release. Hall JW; Grose JH Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):349-72. PubMed ID: 1775647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simultaneous masking and unmasking with bandlimited noise. Lutfi RA J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):899-905. PubMed ID: 6841816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of masker gating for signal detection in unmodulated and modulated bandlimited noise. Hall JW; Grose JH; Hatch DR J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2365-72. PubMed ID: 8865643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band. Schooneveldt GP; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Dec; 82(6):1944-56. PubMed ID: 3429732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]