These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6748148)

  • 1. Total uterine volume: a new graph and its clinical applications.
    Kurtz AB; Kurtz RJ; Rifkin MD; Pasto ME; Cole-Beuglet C; Baltarowich OH; Wapner RJ; Tsatalis J; Goldberg BB
    J Ultrasound Med; 1984 Jul; 3(7):299-308. PubMed ID: 6748148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The inaccuracy of total uterine volume measurements: sources of error and a proposed solution.
    Kurtz AB; Shaw WM; Kurtz RJ; Rifkin MD; Pasto ME; Cole-Beuglet C; Baltarowich OH; Wapner RJ; Foy PM; Morgan PM
    J Ultrasound Med; 1984 Jul; 3(7):289-97. PubMed ID: 6748147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current status of fetal age and growth assessment.
    Chervenak FA; Jeanty P; Hobbins JC
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Dec; 10(3):423-44. PubMed ID: 6360462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intrauterine growth followed ultrasonically in normal and some complicated pregnancies.
    Kirkinen P
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1979; 68(194):1-65. PubMed ID: 380446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of fetal growth retardation by ultrasonographic estimation of total intrauterine volume.
    Levine SC; Filly RA; Creasy RK
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1979 Feb; 7(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 108295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of the small for gestational age fetus with the use of gestational age-independent indices of fetal growth.
    Divon MY; Chamberlain PF; Sipos L; Manning FA; Platt LD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Dec; 155(6):1197-201. PubMed ID: 3538875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying the small-for-gestational-age fetus on the basis of enhanced surfactant production.
    Sher G; Statland BE; Knutzen VK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jan; 61(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 6687405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of nongravid uterine volume based on a nomogram of gravid uterine volume: its value in gynecologic uterine abnormalities.
    Goldstein SR; Horii SC; Snyder JR; Raghavendra BN; Subramanyam B
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jul; 72(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 3288932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nontraditional sonographic pearls in estimating gestational age.
    Gottlieb AG; Galan HL
    Semin Perinatol; 2008 Jun; 32(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 18482614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of intrauterine volume, fetal abdominal area and biparietal diameter measurements with ultrasound in screening for small-for-dates babies.
    Geirsson RT; Patel NB; Christie AD
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1985 Sep; 92(9):929-35. PubMed ID: 3899163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pitfalls in ultrasonic determination of total intrauterine volume.
    Grossman M; Flynn JJ; Aufrichtig D; Handler CR
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1982 Jan; 10(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 6798076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intrauterine volume in pregnancy.
    Geirsson RT
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1986; 136():1-74. PubMed ID: 3544656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Volumetric determination of placental and uterine growth relationships from B-mode ultrasound by serial area-volume determinations.
    Jones TB; Price RR; Gibbs SJ
    Invest Radiol; 1981; 16(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 7216699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longitudinal and transverse uterine area measurements (LTUA) are not representative of intrauterine volume.
    Geirsson RT; Patel NB
    J Ultrasound Med; 1984 Aug; 3(8):353-4. PubMed ID: 6384538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Small for dates: evaluation of different diagnostic methods.
    Horacio Fescina R; Martell M; Martinez G; Lastra L; Schwarcz R
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1987; 66(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 3310503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasonic diagnosis of altered fetal growth by use of a normal ultrasonic fetal weight curve.
    Ott WJ; Doyle S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 6694813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intrauterine volume, fetal abdominal area and biparietal diameter measurements with ultrasound in the prediction of small-for-dates babies in a high-risk obstetric population.
    Geirsson RT; Patel NB; Christie AD
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1985 Sep; 92(9):936-40. PubMed ID: 3899164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uterine artery blood flow volume in pregnant women with an abnormal pulsatility index of the uterine arteries delivering normal or intrauterine growth restricted newborns.
    Ferrazzi E; Rigano S; Padoan A; Boito S; Pennati G; Galan HL
    Placenta; 2011 Jul; 32(7):487-92. PubMed ID: 21531458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The value of biparietal diameter and abdominal perimeter in the diagnosis of growth retardation in twin gestation.
    Barnea ER; Romero R; Scott D; Hobbins JC
    Am J Perinatol; 1985 Jul; 2(3):221-2. PubMed ID: 3893451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pseudoomphalocele: pitfall in fetal sonography.
    Salzman L; Kuligowska E; Semine A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jun; 146(6):1283-5. PubMed ID: 3518373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.