These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6750590)

  • 1. [Clinical use of 4-META adhesive resin].
    Masaka N
    Hotetsu Rinsho; 1982; 15(1):53-77. PubMed ID: 6750590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [4-META adhesive resin and metal inlays].
    Masuhara E
    DE J Dent Eng; 1982; (62):1-9. PubMed ID: 6814829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Dental care and adhesive materials. 4-META resin].
    Nakamura N
    DE J Dent Eng; 1981; (56):36-42. PubMed ID: 6788452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Observation of Ni-Cr dental alloy/4-META adhesive resin interfaces].
    Yanagihara T; Shigeto N; Tokunaga M; Hamada T
    Hiroshima Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1983 Dec; 15(2):353-7. PubMed ID: 6373909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates.
    Nakabayashi N; Kojima K; Masuhara E
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 May; 16(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 7085687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation.
    Wolfart S; Wegner SM; Al-Halabi A; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 14714835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of the retention of two bridge retainers: cemented partial crowns versus adhesive resin-bonded inlays.
    Posti JJ; Näkki K; Siirilä HS
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1980; 76(5-6):258-61. PubMed ID: 7019902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Physical properties of adhesive 4-META resin cement (author's transl)].
    Nagata K; Takeyama M; Nakabayashi N; Masuhara E
    Shika Rikogaku Zasshi; 1981 Apr; 22(58):143-6. PubMed ID: 6945366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of dentin adhesives used as sealers and provisional cementation on bond strength of a resin cement to dentin.
    Chieffi N; Sadek F; Monticelli F; Goracci C; Grandini S; Davidson C; Tay FR; Ferrari M
    Am J Dent; 2006 Apr; 19(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 16764131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of dentin adhesive and cure mode on film thickness and microtensile bond strength to dentin in indirect restorations.
    Coelho Santos MJ; Navarro MF; Tam L; McComb D
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 15765957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Chemical analysis of methacrylate plastics].
    Brauer G
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1975 Oct; 30(10):672-9. PubMed ID: 1100348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single-tooth restorations with a screw-retained, combined crown-and-abutment prosthesis.
    Obradovich RN
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 20(8):465-72; quiz 473. PubMed ID: 18990897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative assessment of light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin adhesives: in vitro study of a new adhesive system.
    Newman GV; Newman RA; Sengupta AK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 11244420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct and indirect composites for the restoration of decimated dentition in elderly patients.
    Trushkowsky R
    Dent Today; 2000 May; 19(5):92-9. PubMed ID: 12524767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Qualitative analysis of adhesive interface nanoleakage using FE-SEM/EDS.
    Yuan Y; Shimada Y; Ichinose S; Tagami J
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):561-9. PubMed ID: 16765432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.