139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6751691)
1. Basic statistics for quality control in the clinical laboratory.
Williams GW; Schork MA
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci; 1982; 17(2):171-99. PubMed ID: 6751691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Precision and accuracy: concepts and assessment by method evaluation testing.
Westgard JO
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci; 1981; 13(4):283-330. PubMed ID: 7016436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assuring analytical quality through process planning and quality control.
Westgard JO
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Jul; 116(7):765-9. PubMed ID: 1497451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laboratory precision performance: state of the art versus operating specifications that assure the analytical quality required by clinical laboratory improvement amendments proficiency testing.
Westgard JO; Bawa N; Ross JW; Lawson NS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Jul; 120(7):621-5. PubMed ID: 8757464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A model for the statistical description of analytical errors occurring in clinical chemical laboratories with time.
Hyvärinen A
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1985; 175():1-84. PubMed ID: 3858970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interinstitutional comparison of bedside blood glucose monitoring program characteristics, accuracy performance, and quality control documentation: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of bedside blood glucose monitoring performed in 226 small hospitals.
Novis DA; Jones BA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):495-502. PubMed ID: 9625416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analytical interferences and analytical quality.
Sonntag O
Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jun; 404(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 19306857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Analytical uncertainty--how wrong can a laboratory result be?].
Bolann BJ; Stølsnes B
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Dec; 119(30):4472-5. PubMed ID: 10827487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What information on quality specifications should be communicated to clinicians, and how?
Plebani M
Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Aug; 346(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 15234633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance goals for the laboratory testing of antithrombin, protein C and protein S.
Meijer P; Haverkate F; Kluft C
Thromb Haemost; 2006 Nov; 96(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 17080214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Improvement of routine works and quality control in mycobacterial laboratory].
Suzuki K; Higuchi T
Kekkaku; 2007 Mar; 82(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 17444126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Internal quality control, proficiency testing, and the clinical relevance of laboratory testing.
Kafka MT
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 3355347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Laboratory diagnosis and practical treatment of patients].
Wagner HA
Urologe A; 1988 Jan; 27(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 3363770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A quality control simulator for design and evaluation of internal quality control procedures.
Groth T; Falk H; Westgard JO
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1984; 172():195-201. PubMed ID: 6599523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Quality specifications and allowable standards for validation of methods used in clinical biochemistry].
Vassault A; Grafmeyer D; de Graeve J; Cohen R; Beaudonnet A; Bienvenu J
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1999; 57(6):685-95. PubMed ID: 10572217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. External quality control program for inter-laboratory quality control.
Bewarder N; Müller P
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(6D):5213-6. PubMed ID: 11326697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [An approach to evaluation methods for laboratory work].
Usui T
Rinsho Byori; 1993 Apr; 41(4):329-39. PubMed ID: 8350494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The use of laboratory data].
Keller H
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1991 Dec; 121(50):1861-9. PubMed ID: 1759145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Some concepts and principles of clinical test evaluation. Classification, analytical performance, monitoring and clinical interpretation. Working Group for the Nordic Clinical Chemistry Project (NORDKEM).
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1992; 208():3-132. PubMed ID: 1509230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Intralaboratory quality control over random and systematic errors using the combined Shewart-cusum check card].
Lambreva L; Dobrev S
Vutr Boles; 1988; 27(4):96-9. PubMed ID: 3213031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
