BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6756533)

  • 1. A comparative trial of sodium meglumine ioxaglate (Hexabrix) and iopamidol (Niopam) for cerebral angiography.
    Molyneux AJ; Sheldon PW; Yates DA
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Dec; 55(660):881-4. PubMed ID: 6756533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Iopromide, a new contrast medium for angiography. Clinical study and comparison with other low-osmolar contrast media].
    Steidle B; Wolf KJ; Banzer D; Seyferath W
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1984 Aug; 109(34):1275-8. PubMed ID: 6381018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized blind trial of Iopamidol and meglumine calcium metrizoate (Triosil 280, Isopaque Cerebral) in cerebral angiography.
    Molyneux AJ; Sheldon PW
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Feb; 55(650):117-9. PubMed ID: 7034840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the side-effects of low-osmolar contrast media in intravenous urography.
    Foord KD; Kaye B; Howard J; Cumberland DC
    Clin Radiol; 1985 Jul; 36(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 4064528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proteinuria following nephroangiography. VII. Comparison between ionic monomeric, monoacidic dimeric and non-ionic contrast media in the dog.
    Törnquist C; Almén T; Golman K; Holtås S
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1980; 362():49-52. PubMed ID: 6267893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Use of iopamidol in selective coronarography: a comparative study in relation to ioxaglate].
    Thévenin P; Amiel M
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1983 Dec; 26(8 Pt 2):769-73. PubMed ID: 6367616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hexabrix (ioxaglate), a new low osmolality contrast agent for lumbar epidural double-catheter venography.
    Meijenhorst GC; de Bruin JN
    Neuroradiology; 1980 Aug; 20(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 6999377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Haemodynamic side effects of meglumine ioglicate, meglumine sodium ioxaglate and iohexol in aortofemoral angiography: comparison of a high-osmolar and two low-osmolar radiological contrast media.
    Wiebe V; Straub H
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():78-84. PubMed ID: 6139084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inhibition of platelet function by contrast media: iopamidol and ioxaglate versus iothalamate. Work in progress.
    Rao AK; Rao VM; Willis J; Beckett C; Steiner RM
    Radiology; 1985 Aug; 156(2):311-3. PubMed ID: 4011893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of pain and heat sensation of contrast media in aortofemoral angiography: meglumine-amidotrizoate (Angiografin) mixed with lidocaine versus sodium-meglumine-ioxaglate (Hexabrix).
    Heystraten FM; van den Berg FG; Mulderije ED
    Diagn Imaging; 1983; 52(2-3):141-4. PubMed ID: 6851813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bronchospasm following intravenous injection of ionic and non-ionic low-osmolality contrast media.
    Longstaff AJ; Henson JH
    Clin Radiol; 1985 Nov; 36(6):651-3. PubMed ID: 3905203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clinical trial of a new low osmolality contrast medium. Sodium and meglumine ioxaglate (Hexabrix) compared with meglumine iothalamate (Conray) for carotid arteriography.
    Grainger RG
    Br J Radiol; 1979 Oct; 52(622):781-6. PubMed ID: 389336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [New contrast media for angiography (Telebrix, Hexabrix) (author's transl)].
    Bohutová J; Kolár J; Karmazin V; Stupáková Z
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1981; 120(50):1527-30. PubMed ID: 7326714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety of contrast media in cerebral angiography: iopamidol vs. methylglucamine iothalamate.
    Bird CR; Drayer BP; Velaj R; Triolo PJ; Allen S; Bates M; Yeates AE; Heinz ER; Osborne DR
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1984; 5(6):801-3. PubMed ID: 6437183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical experiences with Telebrix and Hexabrix in angiography.
    Bohutová J; Kolár J; Karmazin V; Stupákova Z
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1983; 24(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 6683857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative effects on left ventricular function in coronary patients of various contrast media used in coronarography: iopamidol, diatrizoate, ioxaglate].
    Crochet D; Petitier H; de Laguerenne J; Wanlin P; Bourdon A; Grossetête R
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1983 Dec; 26(8 Pt 2):758-63. PubMed ID: 6670837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical trials in adults.
    Mathias K; Seemann W
    Radiol Med; 1986 Jun; 72(6 Suppl 1):44-6. PubMed ID: 3523640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical comparison of Hexabrix, iopamidol, and Urografin-60 in whole body computed tomography.
    Spataro RF; Fischer HW; Kormano M
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S372-5. PubMed ID: 6511276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Urography with low-osmolality contrast media: comparative urinary excretion of Iopamidol, Hexabrix, and diatrizoate.
    Spataro RF; Fischer HW; Boylan L
    Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(5):494-500. PubMed ID: 7141831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Contrast media and pain in peripheral arteriography. Randomized, intra-individual double-blind trial: ioglicinate, ioglicinate-lidocaine, ioxaglate].
    Hagen B; Clauss W
    Radiologe; 1982 Oct; 22(10):470-5. PubMed ID: 6755544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.