These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6756911)

  • 1. Evaluation of four commercial biochemical test systems for identification of yeasts.
    Bergan T; Hollum AB; Vangdal M
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 1(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 6756911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the new Mycotube test-kit for yeast identification.
    Guinet RM
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Feb; 4(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 3886377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Collaborative evaluation of the Abbott yeast identification system.
    Cooper BH; Prowant S; Alexander B; Brunson DH
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jun; 19(6):853-6. PubMed ID: 6381526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Yeast Biochemical Card for rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
    Oblack DL; Rhodes JC; Martin WJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Feb; 13(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 7009641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Identification of yeast-like fungi: evaluation of 4 commercial systems].
    Russolo S; Sala A; Crotti D
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1984 Dec; 20(4):372-8. PubMed ID: 6399580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the new API 20C strip for yeast identification against a conventional method.
    Land GA; Harrison BA; Hulme KL; Cooper BH; Byrd JC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Sep; 10(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 385621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rapid identification of yeasts by semi-automated and conventional methods.
    Qadri SM; Flournoy DJ; Qadri SG; Ramirez EG
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1986; 175(5):307-16. PubMed ID: 3762492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Suitability of the modified API 20 C, Mycotube and Bacto-Candida-albicans-Antiserum for the identification of yeasts in the routine laboratory.
    Dickgiesser N; Pieringer E
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Jun; 247(1):132-7. PubMed ID: 7001803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Abbott Quantum II yeast identification system.
    Salkin IF; Schadow KH; Bankaitis LA; McGinnis MR; Kemna ME
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Sep; 22(3):442-4. PubMed ID: 3900130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A simple disk-diffusion test for differentiation of yeast species.
    Sobczak H
    J Med Microbiol; 1985 Dec; 20(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 3906135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a modified dye pour-plate auxanographic method for the rapid identification of clinically significant yeasts. Comparison with two commercial systems.
    Weymann LH; Stager CE; Qadri SG; Villarreal A; Qadri SM
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1979 Mar; 167(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 375051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.
    Verweij PE; Breuker IM; Rijs AJ; Meis JF
    J Clin Pathol; 1999 Apr; 52(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 10474518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for identification of yeast species isolated from bovine intramammary infection.
    Fadda ME; Pisano MB; Scaccabarozzi L; Mossa V; Deplano M; Moroni P; Liciardi M; Cosentino S
    J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(12):7692-7. PubMed ID: 24119798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system, a new method of clinical yeast identification.
    Davey KG; Chant PM; Downer CS; Campbell CK; Warnock DW
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Sep; 48(9):807-9. PubMed ID: 7490311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differentiation of yeast-like fungi using the commercial Auxacolor system.
    Hantschke D
    Mycoses; 1996; 39(3-4):135-40. PubMed ID: 8767008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simple strategy for direct identification of medically important yeast species from positive blood culture vials.
    Sheppard DC; René P; Harris AD; Miller MA; Laverdière M; deSouza E; Robson HG
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):2040-1. PubMed ID: 10325374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of oral yeast species isolated from individuals with diabetes mellitus.
    Aly FZ; Blackwell CC; MacKenzie DA; Weir DM
    Mycoses; 1995; 38(3-4):107-10. PubMed ID: 7477084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of two commercialized systems for the rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
    Quindós G; Lipperheide V; Pontón J
    Mycoses; 1993; 36(9-10):299-303. PubMed ID: 8015561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Reliability of the Uni-Yeast-Tek system in the routine diagnosis of pathogenic yeasts].
    Wehrspann P
    Mykosen; 1982 Nov; 25(11):599-605. PubMed ID: 6757744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.