These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6756983)
1. [Technic for the use of retraction cord]. Gherardi F; Quaranta M; Montanari G Dent Cadmos; 1982 Mar; 50(3):61-3. PubMed ID: 6756983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Rubber dam technic. III. Gingival retraction for bridgework]. Howard WW; Moller RC Phillip J Restaur Zahnmed; 1984; 1(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 6100698 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Retraction cords with aluminum chloride: effect on the gingiva. Shaw DH; Krejci RF; Cohen DM Oper Dent; 1980; 5(4):138-41. PubMed ID: 7017613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Histological aspects of the marginal gingiva after enlarging the sulcus with retraction cords]. Cordioli GP; Favero GA; Bertolini G; Grego E G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1984; 3(3):578-80. PubMed ID: 6399507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Gingival retraction procedures. Pergola SG; Raskin RB N Y State Dent J; 1983 Nov; 49(9):662, 665, 667. PubMed ID: 6358973 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Gingival retraction preference of dentists in general practice. Shaw DH; Krejci RF Quintessence Int; 1986 May; 17(5):277-80. PubMed ID: 3523582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Using the double-cord packing technique of tissue retraction for making crown impressions. Cloyd S; Puri S Dent Today; 1999 Jan; 18(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10765795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Is the copper band impression technic still current?]. Wupper H Dent Labor (Munch); 1981 Sep; 29(9):1305-11. PubMed ID: 7030814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical comparison of methods of gingival retraction in cemented prosthetics]. Touati B; Dahancohen R Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1983 Mar; (141):17-54. PubMed ID: 6349282 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Epinephrine absorption from retraction cord: a study in dogs. Houston JB; Mettler L; Shapiro N Pharmacol Ther Dent; 1978; 3(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 347460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gingival response to retraction by ferric sulfate (Astringedent). Shaw DH; Krejci RF; Kalkwarf KL; Wentz FM Oper Dent; 1983; 8(4):142-7. PubMed ID: 6366765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of an erbium laser in lieu of retraction cord: a modern technique. Scott A Gen Dent; 2005; 53(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 15833012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impression process: Part III--technique. Terry DA Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007; 19(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 17402629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns. Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of impressions after use of the Magic FoamCord gingival retraction system--a clinical study of 269 abutment teeth. Beier US; Kranewitter R; Dumfahrt H Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 19418859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]