These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6758421)

  • 1. Comparison of the MIC 2000 enteric media with API 20 E and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Courcol RJ; Husson MO; Izard DE; Martin GR
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Sep; 252(4):472-9. PubMed ID: 6758421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of enteric identification systems.
    Borchardt KA; Gibson J
    Health Lab Sci; 1977 Jan; 14(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 319082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods.
    Izard D; Savage C; Enayeh E; Leclerc H; Troonen H
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of Micro-ID, API 20 E and a conventional technique for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae].
    Gregersen T; Persson B; Jensen MM
    Nord Vet Med; 1980 May; 32(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 6992099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Minibact, a new system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Comparison of Minibact, Micro-ID and API 20E with a conventional method as reference.
    Kjaeldgaard P; Nissen B; Lange N; Laursen H
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1986 Apr; 94(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 3524112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of six systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mastroeni P; Carbone M; Fera MT; Teti G
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1983; 76(1-6):3-19. PubMed ID: 6383930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Micro-ID, for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Izard D; Gavini F; Ochin D; Enayeh E; Leclerc H
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1980 Dec; 28(10):681-4. PubMed ID: 7008005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Identification of Gram negative rods and evaluation of their antibiotic sensitivity: comparison of the BIOTEST MHK/ID-system with the API 20E-system and the agar diffusion test].
    Stanek G; Hirschl A; Rotter M
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Oct; 253(1):61-75. PubMed ID: 6817546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Microbact-12E and 24E systems and the API-20E system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mugg P; Hill A
    J Hyg (Lond); 1981 Oct; 87(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 7026673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of API-10s and Minitek with conventional biochemical tests (author's transl)].
    Stanek G; Hirschl A; Rotter M
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Feb; 246(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 6999781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the micro-ID system versus API 20E and conventional media.
    Barry AL; Badal RE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Sep; 10(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 385617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the Micro-ID system (author's transl)].
    Peuckert W; Pelz K
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Aug; 247(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 6999799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Kelly MT; Latimer JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):659-62. PubMed ID: 7024296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Biochemical properties of enterobacteria on polystyrene plates].
    Kuvaeva IB; Kuznetsova GG; Sakimbaeva SD; Grigor'eva AN
    Vopr Pitan; 1985; (5):51-5. PubMed ID: 3909634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Identification of enteric bacteria using the ENTEROtest 1 and 2 and the ENTERO-Rapid systems].
    Sedlácek I; Pakrová E
    Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 1992 Aug; 41(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 1388100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of API 20E System and Encise Enterotube for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae of animal origin.
    Devenish JA; Barnum DA
    Can J Comp Med; 1980 Jul; 44(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 7000321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of two systems for identifying coliform enterobacteria newly described or rarely found in clinical practice].
    Renaud F; Freney J; Gavini F; Boeufgras JM; Fleurette J
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1990; 48(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 2188531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae in frozen microdilution trays prepared by Micro-Media Systems.
    Barry AL; Badal RE; Effinger LJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Oct; 10(4):492-6. PubMed ID: 393717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of two miniaturized systems widely used in the laboratories for the identification of the "Enterobacteriaceae" (author's transl)].
    Santini GF; Crovatto M; Chiaradia V; Marchi MP
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1979 Mar; 15(1):78-102. PubMed ID: 396548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparative evaluation of 2 rapid methods for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae and the API 20 E].
    Cavanna E; Casini Lemmi M; Lanza GC; Meus AL
    Pathologica; 1984; 76(1046):707-18. PubMed ID: 6399550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.