These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6758838)

  • 1. Interim insertion of Multiload Cu 250 IUCD.
    Mylotte MJ; Loudon N
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Sep; 89(Suppl 4):41-2. PubMed ID: 6758838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. General assessment of the Multiload Cu250 intrauterine device. UK network of IUCD research clinics.
    Snowden R
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Sep; 89(Suppl 4):58-65. PubMed ID: 7150529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expulsion of Nova-T380, Multiload 375, and Copper-T380A contraceptive devices inserted during cesarean delivery.
    Ragab A; Hamed HO; Alsammani MA; Shalaby H; Nabeil H; Barakat R; Fetih AN
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Aug; 130(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 25975871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
    Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The IUCD in nulliparous women: with special reference to the Multiload copper 250 'mini' and 'short' IUCDs.
    Goldstuck ND
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Sep; 89(Suppl 4):54-7. PubMed ID: 7150528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of the TCu 380Ag and the Multiload Cu375.
    Cole LP; Potts DM; Aranda C; Behlilovic B; Etman ES; Moreno J; Randic L
    Fertil Steril; 1985 Feb; 43(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 3881295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The multiload intra-uterine contraceptive device. Comparison of 4 different models.
    Van Os WA; De Nooyer CC; Kleinhout J
    S Afr Med J; 1981 Dec; 60(24):938-40. PubMed ID: 7302778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early postpartum insertion of the Multiload Cu250 intrauterine device.
    Emens JM; Shah SR
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Sep; 89(Suppl 4):43-5. PubMed ID: 6758839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Insertion of intrauterine devices: a comparison of experience with Mirena and Multiload Cu 375 during post-marketing monitoring in New Zealand.
    Harrison-Woolrych M; Zhou L; Coulter D
    N Z Med J; 2003 Aug; 116(1179):U538. PubMed ID: 14513085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation from various viewpoints of the Lippes Loop, Multiload Cu 250 and Nova T].
    Bilgin S; Deger S; Ariduru F
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1988; 110(14):893-8. PubMed ID: 3176743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multicenter clinical trial in Nigeria with Multiload-Cu250 (MLCu250) and Multiload-Cu375 (MLCu375) intrauterine devices.
    Van Dierendonck B; Ladipo OA; Ekwempu CC; Giwa-Osagie OF; Ulasi JN
    Adv Contracept; 1992 Dec; 8(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 1290334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clinical study comparing the performance of three IUCDs (Multiload Copper 250, Copper T 200, and Lippes Loop C).
    Fakhr MM; Fakhr DM; Hassan AA; Nasser NM
    Popul Sci; 1988; 8():39-53. PubMed ID: 12316112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Copper intrauterine contraceptive devices in adolescent nulliparae.
    Weiner E; Berg AA; Johansson I
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1978 Mar; 85(3):204-6. PubMed ID: 629899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interim insertion of the ML Cu 250 intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Vankets He Thiery M; Van Der Pas H; Delbeke L Van Os WA; Tauber PE; Dombrowicz N; Macdonald JS; Haspels AA; Drogenduk AC
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1980 Apr; 1(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 12336242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Multiload and copper-T200. A prospective study of 2 types of coils].
    Ladehoff P; Hansen MK; Larsen S; Sørensen T; Westergaard JG
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1981 Jul; 143(28):1765-6. PubMed ID: 7027573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative trial of copper T 380 and Cu 375 IUCD.
    Khan SA; Ul Amin Z; Fouzia ; Jadoon S
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2010; 22(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 22338452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Multiload CU250 in general practice.
    Gadsby R; Holden J
    Practitioner; 1988 Dec; 232(1460):1343, 1347. PubMed ID: 3256888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary report on the use of the combined multiload contraceptive intrauterine device (ML Cu-250).
    Sadovsky E; Yarkoni S
    Fertil Steril; 1978 Nov; 30(5):519-21. PubMed ID: 720641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bacteriological study of extracted IUCDs.
    Harun R; Nayar S; Thum Yin Lai
    Malays J Reprod Health; 1989 Dec; 7(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 12283073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Nova-T 200 intrauterine contraceptive device: a 12 year study.
    Baeyertz JD; Hartfield VJ
    N Z Med J; 1997 May; 110(1043):169-71. PubMed ID: 9196502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.