These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6759455)

  • 1. A quantitative in vivo comparison of six contrast agents by digital subtraction angiography.
    Burbank FH; Brody WR; Hall A; Keyes G
    Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(6):610-6. PubMed ID: 6759455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incidence of fibrillation with isotonic contrast media for intra-arterial coronary digital subtraction angiography.
    Morris TW; Hayakawa K; Sahler LG; Ekholm S
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(3):109-13. PubMed ID: 3522039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast media tonicity. Part II. Isotonic ioxaglate vs. standard renografin for IV-DSA evaluation of the carotid bifurcation, a double-blind prospective clinical trial.
    Burbank FH; Bradley BR; Yegnashankaran S; Enzmann DR
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Apr; 21(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 3516921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pharmacokinetics of contrast media: experimental results in dog and man with CT implications.
    Gardeur D; Lautrou J; Millard JC; Berger N; Metzger J
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1980 Apr; 4(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 7365016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A double-blind clinical comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Turski PA; Gentry LR; Matozzi F; Verma S
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S363-5. PubMed ID: 6392165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of diatrizoate, iopamidol, and ioxaglate for arterial portography. An experimental study in normal dogs and dogs with portal hypertension.
    Burgener FA; Gutierrez OH
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Jul; 20(4):399-402. PubMed ID: 4044182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidence of fibrillation with dilute contrast media for intra-arterial coronary digital subtraction angiography.
    Morris TW; Ventura J
    Invest Radiol; 1986 May; 21(5):416-8. PubMed ID: 3519525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A double-blind clinical study comparing tolerability, safety, and efficacy of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 for intravenous subtraction angiography.
    Nelson JA; Sherry RA
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S366-7. PubMed ID: 6392166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Contrast medium concentration for intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography of vessels in the extremities].
    Rauber K; Starck E; Sauer J; Kollath J; Riemann H
    Rofo; 1985 Nov; 143(5):526-9. PubMed ID: 2999889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of volume and rate of contrast medium injection on intravenous digital subtraction angiographic contrast medium curves.
    Burbank FH; Brody WR; Bradley BR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1984 Aug; 4(2):308-15. PubMed ID: 6376594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Experimental and clinical determination of renal size after intravenous and intra-arterial administration of ionic and non-ionic contrast media].
    Helzel MV; Wolf GK; Prager P
    Rofo; 1985 Mar; 142(3):333-7. PubMed ID: 2984739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast media tonicity. Part I. Effects upon IV-DSA time-concentration curve peak and width: experimental studies.
    Burbank FH; Thompson WM
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Mar; 21(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 3514540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An experimental evaluation of central vs. peripheral injection for intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IV-DSA).
    Rubin DL; Burbank FH; Bradley BR; Brody WR
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 6368460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AUR Memorial Award. Determinants of contrast enhancement for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Burbank FH
    Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 6352557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CT-determined canine kidney and urine iodine concentration following intravenous administration of sodium diatrizoate, metrizamide, iopamidol, and sodium ioxaglate.
    Brennan RE; Rapoport S; Weinberg I; Pollack HM; Curtis JA
    Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 7076442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Seeger JF; Carmody RF; Smith JR; Horsley WW; Criss E
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic tomographic digital subtraction angiography using temporal filtration.
    Kruger RA; Nelson JA; Ghosh-Roy D; Miller FJ; Anderson RE; Liu PY
    Radiology; 1983 Jun; 147(3):863-7. PubMed ID: 6342037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of iopamidol, ioxaglate, and diatrizoate during coronary arteriography in dogs.
    Thomson KR; Evill CA; Fritzsche J; Benness GT
    Invest Radiol; 1980; 15(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 7399847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of diatrizoate, iopamidol, and ioxaglate for the contrast enhancement of experimental hepatic tumors in CT.
    Burgener FA; Steinmetz SD
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Sep; 20(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 4066232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation of computed tomography and nephrography in quantitative comparison of urographic contrast agents.
    Wilson BC; Evill CA
    Radiology; 1981 Jul; 140(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 7244214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.