These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6759524)

  • 1. Rapid processing of urine specimens by urine screening and the AutoMicrobic system.
    Wadke M; McDonnell C; Ashton JK
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Oct; 16(4):668-72. PubMed ID: 6759524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid identification by the Micro-ID system of Enterobacteriaceae detected by urine screening.
    Kelly MT; Hale DC; Matsen JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Sep; 14(3):295-7. PubMed ID: 7026599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid semiautomated screening and processing of urine specimens.
    Jenkins RD; Hale DC; Matsen JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Mar; 11(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 6991523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli from blood cultures by the AutoMicrobic system.
    Moore DF; Hamada SS; Marso E; Martin WJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 May; 13(5):934-9. PubMed ID: 7016914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid method for identification and susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli bacteriuria.
    Dennstedt FE; Stager CE; Davis JR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Jul; 18(1):150-3. PubMed ID: 6350344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of rapid screening tests in processing urine specimens by conventional culture and the AutoMicrobic system.
    Pfaller MA; Koontz FP
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 May; 21(5):783-7. PubMed ID: 3889047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct identification and susceptibility testing by the AutoMicrobic system of gram-negative bacilli from urine specimens.
    Wellstood SA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Jun; 23(6):1068-71. PubMed ID: 3086375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of microscopically screened urine cultures.
    Tilton RE; Tilton RC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Feb; 11(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 6766953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid automated identification of gram-negative bacilli from blood cultures with the AutoMicrobic system.
    Schifman RB; Ryan KJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Feb; 15(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 7040448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of the Replireader in the identification of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from urine and in the recording of sensitivity tests performed by an agar dilution method.
    Waterworth PM
    J Clin Pathol; 1980 Jun; 33(6):571-4. PubMed ID: 6995495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Kelly MT; Latimer JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):659-62. PubMed ID: 7024296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative clinical isolates with the AutoMicrobic system.
    Backes BA; Cavalieri SJ; Rudrik JT; Britt EM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jun; 19(6):744-7. PubMed ID: 6432832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Gram-Negative General Susceptibility-Plus Card.
    Van Horn KG; Vandernoot AM; Burke EW; McKitrick JC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 20(4):630-5. PubMed ID: 6490849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inability to adequately control antimicrobial agents on AutoMicrobic System Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Susceptibility Cards.
    Kellogg JA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Mar; 21(3):454-6. PubMed ID: 3980698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy and reproducibility of the AutoMicrobic System Gram-Negative General Susceptibility-Plus Card for testing selected challenge organisms.
    Nadler HL; Dolan C; Mele L; Kurtz SR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Sep; 22(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 3930559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Novel approach to bacterial identification that uses the autobac system.
    Sielaff BH; Matsen JM; McKie JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Jun; 15(6):1103-10. PubMed ID: 7050148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid reporting of urine culture results: impact of the uro-quick screening system.
    Ilki A; Bekdemir P; Ulger N; Soyletir G
    New Microbiol; 2010 Apr; 33(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 20518276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of contamination levels on antimicrobial susceptibilities tested by Autobac I.
    Shahidi A; Choey I
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Mar; 17(3):389-92. PubMed ID: 7425604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation and optimization of urine screening by Autobac.
    Kelly MT; Balfour LC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Apr; 13(4):677-80. PubMed ID: 7014617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A rapid (4--6-hour) urine-culture system for direct identification and direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
    Heinze PA; Thrupp LD; Anselmo CR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1979 Feb; 71(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 85411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.