These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6760721)

  • 1. Assessment of bracket placement and bond strength when comparing direct bonding to indirect bonding techniques.
    Aguirre MJ; King GJ; Waldron JM
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Oct; 82(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 6760721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bond strength comparison: a simplified indirect technique versus direct placement of brackets.
    Milne JW; Andreasen GF; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Jul; 96(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 2526578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the accuracy of bracket placement between direct and indirect bonding techniques.
    Koo BC; Chung CH; Vanarsdall RL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):346-51. PubMed ID: 10474109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives.
    Zachrisson BU; Brobakken BO
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Jul; 74(1):62-78. PubMed ID: 356618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bond strength of orthodontic direct-bonding cement-plastic bracket systems in vitro.
    de Pulido LG; Powers JM
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Feb; 83(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 6337499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Indirect versus direct bonding: bond strength and failure location.
    Hocevar RA; Vincent HF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Nov; 94(5):367-71. PubMed ID: 3055937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of lingual bracket bond strength.
    Lombardo L; Kaplan A; Lapenta R; Bratti E; Pera C; Scuzzo G; Siciliani G
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(3):178-87. PubMed ID: 22022688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized clinical trial comparing the accuracy of direct versus indirect bracket placement.
    Hodge TM; Dhopatkar AA; Rock WP; Spary DJ
    J Orthod; 2004 Jun; 31(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 15210929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of fourteen direct-bonding orthodontic bases.
    Dickinson PT; Powers JM
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Dec; 78(6):630-9. PubMed ID: 7006404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bond strength of aged composites found in brackets placed by an indirect technique.
    Shiau JY; Rasmussen ST; Phelps AE; Enlow DH; Wolf GR
    Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 8214790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Indirect vs direct bonding of mandibular fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial comparing placement time and failure over a 6-month period.
    Bovali E; Kiliaridis S; Cornelis MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):701-8. PubMed ID: 25432250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A modified direct technique versus conventional direct placement of brackets: in vitro bond strength comparison.
    McAlarney ME; Brenn P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Dec; 104(6):575-83. PubMed ID: 8249933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A 15-month evaluation of bond failures of orthodontic brackets bonded with direct versus indirect bonding technique: a clinical trial.
    Menini A; Cozzani M; Sfondrini MF; Scribante A; Cozzani P; Gandini P
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Dec; 15(1):70. PubMed ID: 25547461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bond strength of orthodontic direct-bonding cement-bracket systems as studied in vitro.
    Buzzitta VA; Hallgren SE; Powers JM
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Feb; 81(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 6758593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A posttreatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics.
    Zachrisson BJ
    Am J Orthod; 1977 Feb; 71(2):173-89. PubMed ID: 319678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bond strength of thermally recycled metal brackets.
    Wheeler JJ; Ackerman RJ
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Mar; 83(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 6338725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the accuracy of bracket positioning between direct and digital indirect bonding techniques in the maxillary arch: a three-dimensional study.
    Aboujaoude R; Kmeid R; Gebrael C; Amm E
    Prog Orthod; 2022 Sep; 23(1):31. PubMed ID: 36058991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bond strength and durability of glass ionomer cements used as bonding agents in the placement of orthodontic brackets.
    Klockowski R; Davis EL; Joynt RB; Wieczkowski G; MacDonald A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Jul; 96(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 2665473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bond strength and clinical efficiency for two light guide sizes in orthodontic bracket bonding.
    Frost T; Norevall LI; Persson M
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Feb; 24(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9088601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do we need primer for orthodontic bonding? A randomized controlled trial.
    Nandhra SS; Littlewood SJ; Houghton N; Luther F; Prabhu J; Munyombwe T; Wood SR
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 25234405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.