These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6763024)

  • 1. Semi-automated counting of bacteria and somatic cells in milk using epifluorescence microscopy and television image analysis.
    Pettipher GL; Rodrigues UM
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1982 Dec; 53(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 6763024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Collaborative trial of the direct epifluorescent filter technique (DEFT), a rapid method for counting bacteria in milk.
    Pettipher GL; Fulford RJ; Mabbitt LA
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1983 Apr; 54(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 6343333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A bacteriostatic mixture for milk samples and its effect on bacteriological, cytological and chemical compositional analysis.
    Pettipher GL; Rodrigues UM
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1982 Apr; 52(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 7107540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Cytological, biochemical and bacteriological evaluation of milk].
    Tolle A
    Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd; 1970 Oct; 112(10):512-33. PubMed ID: 5538262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Bacteriological characteristics of pasteurized milk in the presence of nisine].
    Vanini GC; Moro S
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol Ann Osp Maria Vittor Torino; 1967; 60(5):277-82. PubMed ID: 4900209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methods for the direct and indirect assessment of the bacterial content of milk.
    O'Toole DK
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1983 Oct; 55(2):187-201. PubMed ID: 6197399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Nitrite test in determining the hygienic quality of milk].
    Zagaevskiĭ IS
    Vopr Pitan; 1969; 28(5):66-9. PubMed ID: 4905822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. First results on the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in raw milk: comparison of two different analytical methods.
    Paris A; Riboldi E; Salmi F; Bacci C; Bonardi S; Brindani F
    Vet Res Commun; 2009 Sep; 33 Suppl 1():253-5. PubMed ID: 19568945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid detection of single cell bacteria as a novel approach in food microbiology.
    D'Haese E; Nelis HJ
    J AOAC Int; 2002; 85(4):979-83. PubMed ID: 12180697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multicolour digital image analysis system for identification of bacteria and concurrent assessment of their respiratory activity.
    Ogawa M; Tani K; Ochiai A; Yamaguchi N; Nasu M
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 98(5):1101-6. PubMed ID: 15836479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The use of a method of television microscopic analysis for the rapid demonstration of pathogenetic enterobacteria in milk].
    Shub GM; Khotiushchenko TI; Tupikin DV; Tomnikov AIu; Anifimova SI; Kolomiets VV
    Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1995; (6):71-3. PubMed ID: 8553772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of the results obtained from bacteriological and cytological examinations of various portions of cow's milk.
    Beech JA
    Vet Rec; 1967 Jun; 80(23):667-72. PubMed ID: 6067932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electronic counting of somatic cells in milk.
    Read RB; Reyes AL; Bradshaw JG; Peeler JT
    J Dairy Sci; 1967 May; 50(5):669-74. PubMed ID: 6068438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of somatic cells in milk by solid phase cytometry.
    D'Haese E; Nelis HJ; Reybroeck W
    J Dairy Res; 2001 Feb; 68(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 11289273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of bacteria of dairy origin using miniaturized test-systems.
    Griffiths MW; Phillips JD
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1982 Dec; 53(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 6763025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Biometric evaluation of microbiologic study procedures of foods within the scope of paragraph 35 of the Food and Necessities Law].
    Weiss H; Arndt G
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1985 Feb; 92(2):64-75. PubMed ID: 3884318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Results of physico-chemical and bacteriological tests on specimens of sterilized milk].
    Ghiosso E; Moro S; Vercellotti E
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol Ann Osp Maria Vittor Torino; 1968; 61(11):432-40. PubMed ID: 4906834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Experience in the use of a rapid bacterial analyzer REBIT in laboratories of sanitary and epidemiological services].
    Tulupov VP; Makarova TB; Tuliankina NE
    Gig Sanit; 1998; (3):46-8. PubMed ID: 9662896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the streak-plate and pour-plate techniques for determination of coliform counts of mild samples using crystal violet-neutral red-lactose-bile (VRBL) medium.
    Szita G; Takács J; Lendvai I
    Acta Vet Acad Sci Hung; 1981; 29(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 7044075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Result of the refinement of a technique for the isolation and identification of Campylobacter from food commodities].
    Mouffok F; Lebres E
    Arch Inst Pasteur Alger; 1992; 58():239-46. PubMed ID: 1309139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.