These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6764742)

  • 21. Comparison of the fit of Procera crowns made from stone with those made from polyurethane resin.
    Rahme HY; Adib SM; Zebouni EA; Bechara BB; Rifai KT
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19552368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Surfaces of stone models made by the laminated single impression technique with silicone materials (author's transl)].
    Daito K; Miyauchi H; Okuno T; Mitani S; Takatsu T
    Nihon Shika Zairyo Kikai Gakkai Zasshi; 1974 Jun; 31(2):27-31. PubMed ID: 4620680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Time-dependent accuracy of elastomer impression materials. Part I: Condensation silicones.
    Lacy AM; Bellman T; Fukui H; Jendresen MD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Feb; 45(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 7009840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reproduction of details using dental stones and investment material in impressions of elastomers and waxes.
    Nilner K; Owall B
    Swed Dent J; 1982; 6(6):249-55. PubMed ID: 6963007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M
    J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Production of test blocks duplicated by electroforming for detail reproduction of impressions made with impression materials.
    Nishiyama M; Kaketani M; Matsudaira S; Ohashi M
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1984 Sep; 26(3):211-37. PubMed ID: 6394724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using polyvinyl impressions for study models: a case report.
    Perry R
    Dent Today; 2004 Oct; 23(10):106-7. PubMed ID: 15559460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Global impressions in occlusion].
    Audoire P; Bugugnani R
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1972; 19(3):175-84. PubMed ID: 4563696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Reliability of silicone elastomer for impressions].
    Deyrolle G
    Inf Dent; 1975 Oct; 57(41):45-50. PubMed ID: 801831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Dimensional characteristics in various impression methods with viscoelastic materials for inlays, crowns and bridges].
    Dumfahrt H; Schäffer H
    Z Stomatol; 1987 Sep; 84(5):231-9. PubMed ID: 3328940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Various impression taking methods].
    Enomoto T
    Shikai Tenbo; 1984 Jul; 64(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 6390747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Comparative analysis of the marginal adaptation of castings in the evaluation of new systems of impression materials].
    Gaucher H; Soucy B; Parent R
    J Dent Que; 1986; 23():497-500. PubMed ID: 3543083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The impression accuracy of abutment teeth for full cast crowns with adjacent anterio-posterior teeth].
    Aichi T
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1984 Jun; 84(6):925-47. PubMed ID: 6397865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Dimensional changes of stone models made by the laminated single impression technique with silicone materials (author's transl)].
    Kurosaki N; Takatsu T; Kezuka K; Kuroiwa S; Yokoyama H
    Nihon Shika Zairyo Kikai Gakkai Zasshi; 1974 Jun; 31(2):21-6. PubMed ID: 4620679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
    Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ
    Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Influences of hardness of heavy-body-type silicone impression materials on dimensional accuracy of stone dies].
    Nakamura Y
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1986 Sep; 12(3):343-66. PubMed ID: 3333101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Technique and materials for obtaining accurate impressions in 60 to 90 seconds.
    Werrin SR
    Dent Today; 2003 Mar; 22(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 12705017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Dental impression materials, with special reference to silicone materials].
    Takagi I
    Nihon Shika Ishikai Zasshi; 1977; 30(7):678-85. PubMed ID: 357667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1% remakes.
    Abrams SH
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):56-9. PubMed ID: 12242834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.