165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6765796)
1. From the central office notebook.
Renfrow S
Tex Dent J; 1980 Mar; 98(3):21-2. PubMed ID: 6765796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Federal Trade Commission antitrust enforcement in the dental profession.
Ragan MR
J Law Ethics Dent; 1990; 3():5-11. PubMed ID: 2098529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. FTC drops advertising case against California Dental Association.
Nicol GH
Todays FDA; 2001 Apr; 13(4):30. PubMed ID: 15022698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Achieving consensus.
Conley JF
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2000 Nov; 28(11):821-2. PubMed ID: 11811229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An advertising conundrum.
Albert SB
N Y State Dent J; 1996 May; 62(5):4-5. PubMed ID: 8692463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Should the federal trade commission allow dentistry to require its members to adhere to a high standard in advertising?
Allamano BL
J Am Coll Dent; 1996; 63(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 8920065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dental group drills FTC. High-court case questions authority over not-for-profits.
Hallam K
Mod Healthc; 1998 Nov; 28(44):2. PubMed ID: 10186349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Vindication in court. A review of the 9th Circuit's ruling in California Dental Association vs. FTC.
Sfikas PM
J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Nov; 131(11):1633-5. PubMed ID: 11103585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The case for/against the effectiveness of dental services advertising: implications and recommendations.
Sanchez PM
J Dent Pract Adm; 1988; 5(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 3166032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. California Dental Association vs. Federal Trade Commission.
Sfikas PM
J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Jul; 130(7):1127-8. PubMed ID: 10422411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Federal Trade Commission's regulation of advertising claims for dietary supplements.
Peeler CL; Cohn S
Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 10343004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Regulating the regulators: the Supreme Court's turn.
Wilcox DP
Tex Med; 1981 Nov; 77(11):76-9. PubMed ID: 7323971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. American Medical Association vs. Federal Trade Commission.
Conn Med; 1982 Nov; 46(11):673-5. PubMed ID: 7172670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dentists' advertising. Patient welfare or caveat emptor.
Boerschinger TH
Dentistry; 1989 Dec; 9(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 2639784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Presenting the California Dental Association's case. The oral argument in CDA vs. Federal Trade Commission.
Sfikas PM
J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 131(6):812-4. PubMed ID: 10860337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Liar liar: Federal Trade Commission rooting out false diet advertisers.
Blumberg S
J Am Diet Assoc; 2005 Dec; 105(12):1850-3. PubMed ID: 16321585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. More unbridled bureaucracy.
Laney WR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1994; 9(2):143. PubMed ID: 8206546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Advertising gone too far?
Quinn C
Mark Health Serv; 2008; 28(4):20-3. PubMed ID: 19157035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Physician advertising.
Lober CW
Dermatol Clin; 1993 Apr; 11(2):281-4. PubMed ID: 8477539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dentists to get green light on more creative advertising.
Plunkett LR
N Y State Dent J; 1996 Apr; 62(4):12-4. PubMed ID: 8668307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
