142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6766951)
1. Indirect hemagglutination employing enterobacterial common antigen and Yersinia somatic antigen: a technique to differentiate brucellosis from infections involving cross-reacting Yersinia enterocolitica.
Mittal KR; Ricciardi ID; Tizard IR
J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Feb; 11(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 6766951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Serological cross-reactions between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9.
Mittal KR; Tizard IR; Barnum DA
Int J Zoonoses; 1985 Sep; 12(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 2422134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Serologic response of pigs to experimental infection with Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O9 and Brucella abortus.
Mittal KR; Tizard IR
Am J Vet Res; 1981 Mar; 42(3):443-6. PubMed ID: 6791534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A simple technique to differentiate between animals infected with Yersinia enterocolitica IX and those infected with Brucella abortus.
Mittal KR; Tizard IR
Res Vet Sci; 1979 Mar; 26(2):248-50. PubMed ID: 122268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Diagnostic value of the protein antigens of Br. abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica type 9].
Kostov G; Bozilov B; Todorova P; Todorov T
Vet Med Nauki; 1980; 17(5):60-6. PubMed ID: 6165133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 II the use of Yersinia outer proteins for the specific detection of Yersinia enterocolitica infections in ruminants.
Kittelberger R; Hilbink F; Hansen MF; Ross GP; Joyce MA; Fenwick S; Heesemann J; Wolf-Watz H; Nielsen K
Vet Microbiol; 1995 Dec; 47(3-4):271-80. PubMed ID: 8748542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Studies on the relationship between Yersinia enterocolitica IX and Brucella abortus agglutinins in naturally infected animals.
Mittal KR; Tizard IR
Res Vet Sci; 1980 May; 28(3):311-4. PubMed ID: 6774395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Serological discrimination by indirect enzyme immunoassay between the antibody response to Brucella sp. and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 in cattle and pigs.
Nielsen K; Smith P; Yu W; Nicoletti P; Jungersen G; Stack J; Godfroid J
Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2006 Jan; 109(1-2):69-78. PubMed ID: 16140390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Contribution to the differentiation of cross-reacting antibodies in brucellosis serology--1. Reactions with various Yersinia serotypes and antibody avidity].
Staak C; Draeger A; Bahn P; Nöckler K
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2000 Oct; 113(10):361-7. PubMed ID: 11084752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Serological cross-reactivity between Brucella abortus and yersinia enterocolitica 0:9: IV. Evaluation of the M- and C-epitope antibody response for the specific detection of B. abortus infections.
Kittelberger R; Bundesen PG; Cloeckaert A; Greiser-Wilke I; Letesson JJ
Vet Microbiol; 1998 Feb; 60(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 9595626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9. III. Specificity of the in vitro antigen-specific gamma interferon test for bovine brucellosis diagnosis in experimentally Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9-infected cattle.
Kittelberger R; Reichel MP; Joyce MA; Staak C
Vet Microbiol; 1997 Oct; 57(4):361-71. PubMed ID: 9444073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The antigenic relationship between Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 0:3 and 0:9].
Kocabeyoğlu O
Mikrobiyol Bul; 1990 Jul; 24(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 1704479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differentiation of Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 09 infections: use of lymphocyte transformation test.
Chukwu CC
Int J Zoonoses; 1985 Jun; 12(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 3935592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Reproduction of Brucella titers in swine using experimental infection with Yersinia enterocolitica, serotypes 0:9 and 0:6].
Nattermann H; Horsch F; Zimmermann H
Arch Exp Veterinarmed; 1980; 34(5):741-52. PubMed ID: 6779772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental studies on the serological relationships between Yersinia enterocolitica and Brucella abortus.
Mittal KR; Tizard IR
Res Vet Sci; 1979 Nov; 27(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 120574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differentiation of Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 09 infections in cattle: the use of specific lymphocyte transformation and brucellin skin tests.
Chukwu CC
Vet Q; 1987 Apr; 9(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 3113038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Human and animal epidemic of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9, 1989-1997, Auvergne, France.
Gourdon F; Beytout J; Reynaud A; Romaszko JP; Perre D; Theodore P; Soubelet H; Sirot J
Emerg Infect Dis; 1999; 5(5):719-21. PubMed ID: 10511531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enzyme immunoassay of the antibody response to Brucella and Yersinia enterocolitica 09 infections in humans.
Lindberg AA; Haeggman S; Karlson K; Carlsson HE; Mair NS
J Hyg (Lond); 1982 Apr; 88(2):295-307. PubMed ID: 6174601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Serological relationship between cattle exposed to Brucella abortus, Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 and Escherichia coli O157:H7.
Nielsen K; Smith P; Widdison J; Gall D; Kelly L; Kelly W; Nicoletti P
Vet Microbiol; 2004 May; 100(1-2):25-30. PubMed ID: 15135510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of interferon-gamma producing cells during infections by Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 and Brucella abortus in cattle.
Agnone A; La Manna MP; Vesco G; Gargano V; Macaluso G; Dieli F; Sireci G; Villari S
Vet Ital; 2019 Jun; 55(2):149-155. PubMed ID: 31274176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
