132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6767360)
1. Mammography at reduced doses: present performance and future possibilities.
Muntz EP; Wilkinson E; George FW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1980 Apr; 134(4):741-7. PubMed ID: 6767360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technologic improvements in screen-film mammography.
Haus AG
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):628-37. PubMed ID: 2406777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recent experience in mammography using Trimax rare-earth system.
Bruwer A
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1976 Dec; 27(4):283-5. PubMed ID: 186459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Mammography with minimal radiation dosage. Comparative studies on various imaging systems].
Weissleder H; Kiefer H
Rofo; 1977 Jun; 126(6):520-8. PubMed ID: 142713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [New development in mammographic technique: Grid mammography (author's transl)].
Friedrich M
Rofo; 1978 Feb; 128(2):207-22. PubMed ID: 147219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technical developments in mammography.
Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG; Jong RA
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):599-611. PubMed ID: 18849694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiologic detection of breast cancer. Review and recommendations.
Sadowsky NL; Kalisher L; White G; Ferrucci JT
N Engl J Med; 1976 Feb; 294(7):370-3. PubMed ID: 1246289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation exposure of the breast in film- and xero-mammography.
Säbel M; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F
Strahlentherapie; 1976 Jun; 151(6):504-10. PubMed ID: 936250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of mammography screen-film combinations.
Schueler BA; Gray JE; Gisvold JJ
Radiology; 1992 Sep; 184(3):629-34. PubMed ID: 1509043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Reduction of radiation dose during film mammography using a new film-screen combination. Inital report (author's transl)].
Buck J; Barth V
Rofo; 1978 Jul; 129(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 149720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation doses in the UK trial of breast screening in women aged 40-48 years.
Young KC
Br J Radiol; 2002 Apr; 75(892):362-70. PubMed ID: 12000696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of increasing film processing time to reduce radiation dose during mammography.
Skubic SE; Yagan R; Oravec D; Shah Z
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Dec; 155(6):1189-93. PubMed ID: 2122664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Report of the "ad hoc" committee on mammography rapport du comite "ad hoc" sur la mammographie.
Léger JL; Naimark AP; Béique RA; McFarlane DV; Miller S; Miller AB
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1974 Mar; 25(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 4595875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammography in 1980: an historical perspective and present state of the art.
Snyder RE
Clin Bull; 1980; 10(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 7389079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose comparisons for mammographic systems.
Speiser RC; Zanrosso EM; Jeromin LS; Carlson RA
Med Phys; 1986; 13(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 3784994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new low dose mammography technique.
Chang CH; Sibala JL; Martin NL; Riley RC
Rev Interam Radiol; 1977 Apr; 2(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 866902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation dosage to the breast in well-women screening surveys.
Asbury DL; Barker PG
Br J Radiol; 1975 Dec; 48(576):963-7. PubMed ID: 1218356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiological aspects of the West London screening programme for breast neoplasms.
Price JL; Nathan BE
Proc R Soc Med; 1975 Jul; 68(7):438-40. PubMed ID: 1236548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of mammographic screen-film systems.
Arnold BA; Webster EW; Kalisher L
Radiology; 1978 Oct; 129(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 693873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical advantage of xeroradiography in the diagnosis of breast cancer].
Takahashi I; Suzuki K
Gan No Rinsho; 1985 May; Suppl():83-95. PubMed ID: 4068235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
